The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information &Amp; Knowledge Management 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3511808.3557247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AutoXAI

Abstract: A large number of XAI (eXplainable Artificial Intelligence) solutions have been proposed in recent years. Recently, thanks to new XAI evaluation metrics, it has become possible to compare these XAI solutions. However, selecting the most relevant XAI solution among all this diversity is still a tedious task, especially if a user has specific needs and constraints. In this paper, we propose AutoXAI, a framework that recommends the best XAI solution and its hyperparameters according to specified XAI evaluation me… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two primary paradigms dominate the discourse: fully automated evaluation and human-in-the-loop (HIL) approaches. Proponents of the former approach advocate for quantitative metrics to assess explanations objectively [15,58,59]. However, defining universally applicable metrics that capture the essence of explanations and allow comparisons across diverse XAI methods proves challenging.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two primary paradigms dominate the discourse: fully automated evaluation and human-in-the-loop (HIL) approaches. Proponents of the former approach advocate for quantitative metrics to assess explanations objectively [15,58,59]. However, defining universally applicable metrics that capture the essence of explanations and allow comparisons across diverse XAI methods proves challenging.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%