1982
DOI: 10.2307/2443076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autotriploid and Autotetraploid Cytogenetic Analyses: Correction Coefficients for Proposed Binomial Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore observed chiasmata distributions do not deviate from non-random expectations and are consistent with Jackson & Hauber's (1982) model. This assigns an obligate minimum of one chiasma and a maximum of two chiasmata per bivalent (or bivalent-equivalent), operating at low to moderate chiasma frequency per microsporocyte.…”
Section: Chromosome Pairingsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore observed chiasmata distributions do not deviate from non-random expectations and are consistent with Jackson & Hauber's (1982) model. This assigns an obligate minimum of one chiasma and a maximum of two chiasmata per bivalent (or bivalent-equivalent), operating at low to moderate chiasma frequency per microsporocyte.…”
Section: Chromosome Pairingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Equations for deriving the expected frequencies are based on non-random distribution of chiasmata, which is the norm for meiotic systems (Jackson 1982). For diploids, equations given by Jackson & Hauber (1982) were used. In normal diploids, bivalents are either unichiasmate or bichiasmate.…”
Section: Chromosome Pairingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytological observations of tetraploids of both varieties have revealed the occurrence of quadrivalents at diakinesis and the first metaphase of meiosis, as well as reduced pollen fertility (Raman & Kesavan, 1964;Arbo & Fernandez, 1983;Fernandez, 1987;Shore, 1991). Finally, frequencies of meiotic configurations fit the autotetraploid pairing models of Jackson & Hauber (1982) for four of six populations investigated (Shore, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In tetraploids, however, due to the more complex nature of segregation possible with four gene copies per individual, segregation of S-genotypes could be performed independently, but grouping of phenotypes could not be completely assessed without considering genotype information. Multiple complex models of allelic segregation in tetraploids are possible (eg Jackson and Hauber, 1982;Wu et al, 2001), but for simplicity only the two most extreme models were considered here: (1) tetrasomic inheritance, which results when there is completely independent segregation of each allele (expected to be more common in autotetraploids); and (2) disomic inheritance, which results when parental alleles tend to segregate together so that inheritance is effectively diploid (expected to be more common in allotetraploids). Fit of these models to the expected genotype and phenotype classes was evaluated using w 2 with degrees of freedom equal to nÀ1, where n is the number of expected genotype classes.…”
Section: Segregation Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%