2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autotomy reduces feeding, energy storage and growth of the sea star Stichaster striatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it has been surmised that tail loss in juveniles may have little cost other than the temporary loss of the ability to autotomize (Dial and Fitzpatrick, 1981), it is evident that, for leopard geckos at least, considerable stored fat may be lost through this process, even at very young ages (Lynn et al, 2013). In juveniles of this species, the energetic cost of regeneration is considerable, and regrowth following maximal autotomy is accelerated at the expense of normal body growth (snout-vent length and mass) (Lynn et al, 2013), the tail displaying compensatory regeneration (the preferential regrowth of a lost structure at the expense of overall growth: Diaz-Guisado et al, 2006;Barría and González, 2008;Lynn et al, 2013). Even in the face of reduced food availability and intake, juvenile leopard geckos of both sexes preferentially divert energy so that the regenerating tail grows at a substantially faster rate than the tail of their original-tailed counterparts (Lynn et al, 2013).…”
Section: Q2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been surmised that tail loss in juveniles may have little cost other than the temporary loss of the ability to autotomize (Dial and Fitzpatrick, 1981), it is evident that, for leopard geckos at least, considerable stored fat may be lost through this process, even at very young ages (Lynn et al, 2013). In juveniles of this species, the energetic cost of regeneration is considerable, and regrowth following maximal autotomy is accelerated at the expense of normal body growth (snout-vent length and mass) (Lynn et al, 2013), the tail displaying compensatory regeneration (the preferential regrowth of a lost structure at the expense of overall growth: Diaz-Guisado et al, 2006;Barría and González, 2008;Lynn et al, 2013). Even in the face of reduced food availability and intake, juvenile leopard geckos of both sexes preferentially divert energy so that the regenerating tail grows at a substantially faster rate than the tail of their original-tailed counterparts (Lynn et al, 2013).…”
Section: Q2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of an arm of a sea star (Diaz-Guisado et al 2006) impacts the effectiveness of feeding. Intact individuals grew more rapidly than did autotomized ones, and those individuals that had suffered autotomy directed energy preferentially to regrowth of the lost arm over that dedicated to body growth, bringing about accelerated reestablishment of feeding effectiveness (Diaz-Guisado et al 2006). In contrast, the chelipeds of porcelain crabs are not employed in foraging but are indicative of social status and effectiveness in mating (Barría and González 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, sublethal predation (i.e. loss of arms) could have a considerable impact, as it may lead to decreases in mobility and feeding, and consequently reduced energy storage and growth (Lawrence & Vásquez 1996, Díaz-Guisado et al 2006, Naya & Bozinovic 2006. Although sublethal predation clearly leads to decreased fitness in many species (see Maginnis 2006), it is rarely incorporated into predator-prey models (for an exception see Zajac 1995 Maginnis 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%