2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autothermal reforming of Fischer–Tropsch diesel over alumina and ceria–zirconia supported catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has been preceded by others from the same research group . These papers describe methods for preparing the 2 catalysts in series, as reported by González et al Their results on Fischer‐Tropsch (FT) diesel and low‐sulfur diesel ATR essentially corroborate previous and parallel knowledge of the following facts : (a) Ph, Pt and Ph‐Pt have high ATR catalytic activity; (b) Pt has higher C deposition tendency than Pd and, if not promoted, they deactivate rapidly via coke formation and sintering phenomena; (c) CeO 2 and La 2 O 3 doping is highly beneficial because of the higher O‐transfer capacity conferred; (d) Rh oxides can be correlated to catalyst activity in terms of fuel conversion. Moreover, they prove that zone‐coated catalysts, made by 2 successive (in‐series) layers wash‐coated on a monolith, where each layer is different, can offer significant advantages because the first one can be more active on POX, which is faster than SR reaction, and the second beneath the first can be more active on SR.…”
Section: Generic Catalytic Technologiessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study has been preceded by others from the same research group . These papers describe methods for preparing the 2 catalysts in series, as reported by González et al Their results on Fischer‐Tropsch (FT) diesel and low‐sulfur diesel ATR essentially corroborate previous and parallel knowledge of the following facts : (a) Ph, Pt and Ph‐Pt have high ATR catalytic activity; (b) Pt has higher C deposition tendency than Pd and, if not promoted, they deactivate rapidly via coke formation and sintering phenomena; (c) CeO 2 and La 2 O 3 doping is highly beneficial because of the higher O‐transfer capacity conferred; (d) Rh oxides can be correlated to catalyst activity in terms of fuel conversion. Moreover, they prove that zone‐coated catalysts, made by 2 successive (in‐series) layers wash‐coated on a monolith, where each layer is different, can offer significant advantages because the first one can be more active on POX, which is faster than SR reaction, and the second beneath the first can be more active on SR.…”
Section: Generic Catalytic Technologiessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Very recently, González et al tested the ATR of FT diesel over bimetallic Pt‐Pd on δ‐Al 2 O 3 and CeO 2 /ZrO 2 monolithic supports. A full‐scale reformer (internal diameter = 84 mm, length = 400 mm) at 650‐750°C was included, with the 2 catalysts coated on the monoliths and positioned in series (Figure ). The catalysts were composed of 1:1 wt% Rh:Pt as active metals.…”
Section: Generic Catalytic Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Ag/ZrO 2 catalyst showed similar surface area (46 m 2 g À1 ) than pure ZrO 2 support (45 m 2 g À1 ). [34][35][36][37] The N 2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the samples were shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same behaviour of area decrease as the percentage of cerium increase is reported in the specific areas of monometallic and bimetallic. However, the surface areas between Ru‐ZrO 2 and Ru−Au‐ZrO 2 reveal an increase in the specific surface area 65 and 66 m 2 /g, attributed to the unification of metals on the surface of ZrO 2 and incorporation of Ru and Au within the pore channels, which influence the formation of new pore tunnels, because of this, there are areas of slightly larger surface than pure ZrO 2 , this phenomenon has been described by several researchers group . On the other hand, the results (Table ) show that the addition of cerium acetyl acetonate during supports synthesis has an effect on reaction rates of hydrolysis‐condensation during the sol‐gel method producing in this case an effect that does not benefit the surface of the specific area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%