1990
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoregulation of Cerebral Blood Flow in Experimental Focal Brain Ischemia

Abstract: Summary:The relationship between systemic arterial pressure (SAP) and neocortical microcirculatory blood flow (CBF) in areas of focal cerebral ischemia was stud ied in 15 spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) anes thetized with halothane (0.5%). Ischemia was induced by ipsilateral middle cerebral artery/common carotid artery occlusion and CBF was monitored continuously in the ischemic territory using laser-Doppler flow me try during manipulation of SAP with I-norepinephrine (hyperten sion) or nitroprusside (h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
94
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(34 reference statements)
6
94
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Doubling of LCBF in the normal hemisphere by hypercapnia or hypertension for 1 h following MCA occlusion did not alter the distribu tion or size of the infarction produced by MCA oc clusion. While changes within the penumbra were not measured, it is probable that the flow changes would be enhanced, since autoregulation is partially impaired in that zone (Dirnagl and Pulsinelli, 1990). The failure of elevations of LCBF to modify the magnitude of the infarction is in accord with the conclusions of some (Fenske et aI., 1975;Bleyarert et aI., 1980) but not all (Hayashi et aI., 1984;Drum mond et aI., 1988) that elevating LCBF does not afford protection from focal ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Doubling of LCBF in the normal hemisphere by hypercapnia or hypertension for 1 h following MCA occlusion did not alter the distribu tion or size of the infarction produced by MCA oc clusion. While changes within the penumbra were not measured, it is probable that the flow changes would be enhanced, since autoregulation is partially impaired in that zone (Dirnagl and Pulsinelli, 1990). The failure of elevations of LCBF to modify the magnitude of the infarction is in accord with the conclusions of some (Fenske et aI., 1975;Bleyarert et aI., 1980) but not all (Hayashi et aI., 1984;Drum mond et aI., 1988) that elevating LCBF does not afford protection from focal ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess whether the protective actions of RIL or IDA might relate to increasing CBF in the terri tory of tissue salvage, a region in which others have shown LCBF is substantially reduced (Dirnagl and Pulsinelli, 1990) following occlusion of the MCA. LCBF was ele vated in groups of five rats by either hypercapnia or hypertension.…”
Section: Effects Of Elevating Cbfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FN or RVL was stimulated for 1 h (1 s on-l s off; 0.5-ms pulse duration; 50 Hz at five times the stimulus current needed to elevate AP by 10 mm Hg; 70-100 f.LA) while maintaining AP within autoregulated range for rCBF in SHRs (80-175 mm Hg) (Dirnagl and Pulsinelli, 1990) by simultaneously withdrawing blood (Nakai et aI., 1982). Sham-treated controls were not stimulated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately following MCA occlusion, agents were administered intravenously with AP maintained within the autoregulated range (Dirnagl and Pulsinelli, 1990), if necessary, by infusion of phenylephrine (PHE). After 1 h, the cranial wound was covered with Gelfoam (Upjohn) and closed with sutures.…”
Section: Occlusion Of Mcamentioning
confidence: 99%