1996
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00478-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoradiographic localization of functional muscarinic receptors in the rat superior cervical sympathetic ganglion reveals an extensive distribution over non-synaptic surfaces of neuronal somata, dendrites and nerve endings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differential placement is also suggested by efferent stimulation in the frog in that it appears to only activate the fast excitatory response, although, in these same preparations, a slower mAChR-mediated excitation was activated using cholinergic agonists (Bernard et al 1985). Analogous to autonomic ganglia and glutamatergic synapses, cartography of the vestibular efferent synapse may be proposed where nicotinic receptors are typically clustered within the synapse and muscarinic receptors are located perisynaptically (Ramcharan and Matthews 1996;Wakade and Wakade 1983). Differences in localization of muscarinic versus nicotinic receptors may account for the difficulty in activating R DMPP with exogenously applied ACh and failure to activate slow excitatory responses using direct electrical stimulation of efferents.…”
Section: Differential Synaptic Placementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Differential placement is also suggested by efferent stimulation in the frog in that it appears to only activate the fast excitatory response, although, in these same preparations, a slower mAChR-mediated excitation was activated using cholinergic agonists (Bernard et al 1985). Analogous to autonomic ganglia and glutamatergic synapses, cartography of the vestibular efferent synapse may be proposed where nicotinic receptors are typically clustered within the synapse and muscarinic receptors are located perisynaptically (Ramcharan and Matthews 1996;Wakade and Wakade 1983). Differences in localization of muscarinic versus nicotinic receptors may account for the difficulty in activating R DMPP with exogenously applied ACh and failure to activate slow excitatory responses using direct electrical stimulation of efferents.…”
Section: Differential Synaptic Placementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Blockade of M 1 R signaling in satellite cells within the DRG, which then affects neighboring neurons, also cannot be excluded. However, M 1 R expression has not yet been demonstrated in satellite cells, and a study utilizing electron microscopy combined with autoradiography in rat superior cervical ganglia found specific binding of a muscarinic agonist to the M 1 R in neuronal somata and dendrites and not satellite cells (61). Given the possible range of off-target effects of the antimuscarinic drugs, it was promising that, from a therapeutic standpoint, no side effects were observed.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscarinic receptors on rat sympathetic neurons are widely distributed over their somatic and dendritic surfaces and are not focally concentrated at synapses, as demonstrated in a definitive study by Ramcharan and Matthews (1996) using light and electron microscopic autoradiography.…”
Section: Presynaptic Output In ␣3mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Muscarinic receptors on rat sympathetic neurons are not focally concentrated at synapses but are widely distributed over their somatic and dendritic surfaces, with higher densities on the soma (Ramcharan and Matthews, 1996). For acetylcholine to reach muscarinic receptors during synaptic transmission, it must diffuse from the synapses (Brown and Selyanko, 1985).…”
Section: Muscarinic Responses On ␣3mentioning
confidence: 99%