2019
DOI: 10.1101/720839
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AutoPVS1: An automatic classification tool for PVS1 interpretation of null variants

Abstract: Null variants are prevalent within human genome, and their accurate interpretation is critical for clinical management. In 2018, the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) Working Group refined the only criterion (PVS1) for pathogenicity in the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. The refinement may improve interpretation consistency, but it also brings hurdles to biocurators because of the complicated workflows and multiple… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…o Mutalyzer (https://mutalyzer.nl/) (Wildeman, van Ophuizen, den Dunnen, & Taschner, 2008) o VariantValidator (https://variantvalidator.org/) (Freeman, Hart, Gretton, Brookes, & Dalgleish, 2018) o Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) recommendations for sequence variant nomenclature (https://varnomen.hgvs.org/) (den Dunnen et al, 2016)  Integrated databases: o VarSome (https://varsome.com/) (Kopanos et al, 2019) o VarCards (http://varcards.biols.ac.cn/) (J. Li et al, 2018) o Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) (license required for professional version) (http://www.hgmd.org/) (Stenson et al, 2017) o Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD) (https://www.lovd.nl/) (Fokkema et al, 2011) o ClinGen Evidence Repository (https://erepo.clinicalgenome.org/evrepo/) o Protein Variation Effect Analyzer (PROVEAN) (http://provean.jcvi.org/) (Choi & Chan, 2015) o Mutationtaster (http://mutationtaster.org/) (Schwarz et al, 2014) o PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) (Adzhubei et al, 2013) o Human Splicing Finder (http://www.umd.be/HSF3/index.html/) (Desmet et al, 2009) o MaxEntScan (http://hollywood.mit.edu/burgelab/maxent/Xmaxentscan_scoreseq.html) (Yeo & Burge, 2004) o NNSPLICE (http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html) (Reese et al, 1997) o SpliceAI (https://github.com/Illumina/SpliceAI) (Jaganathan et al, 2019) o subRVIS (http://subrvis.org/) (Gussow et al, 2016) o Pathogenic Variant Enriched Regions (PER) viewer (http://per.broadinstitute.org/) (Pérez-Palma et al, 2019;Perez-Palma et al, 2020) o Constrained Coding Regions (CCRs) Browser (http://www.rebrand.ly/ccrregions/) (Havrilla et al, 2019) o MISCAST (http://miscast.broadinstitute.org/) (Iqbal et al, 2019) o Rare Exome Variant Ensembl Learner (REVEL) (https://sites.google.com/site/revelgenomics/) (Ioannidis et al, 2016) o ClinPred (https://sites.google.com/site/clinpred/) (Alirezaie et al, 2018)  Other useful tools: o alleleFrequencyApp (https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/) (Whiffin et al, 2017) o Automatic PVS1 interpretation (AutoPVS1) tool (http://autopvs1.genetics.bgi.com/) (Xiang et al, 2019) o MedCalc (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php/) o InterVar (http://wintervar.wglab.org/) (Q.…”
Section:  Variant Nomenclature Verification Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…o Mutalyzer (https://mutalyzer.nl/) (Wildeman, van Ophuizen, den Dunnen, & Taschner, 2008) o VariantValidator (https://variantvalidator.org/) (Freeman, Hart, Gretton, Brookes, & Dalgleish, 2018) o Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) recommendations for sequence variant nomenclature (https://varnomen.hgvs.org/) (den Dunnen et al, 2016)  Integrated databases: o VarSome (https://varsome.com/) (Kopanos et al, 2019) o VarCards (http://varcards.biols.ac.cn/) (J. Li et al, 2018) o Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) (license required for professional version) (http://www.hgmd.org/) (Stenson et al, 2017) o Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD) (https://www.lovd.nl/) (Fokkema et al, 2011) o ClinGen Evidence Repository (https://erepo.clinicalgenome.org/evrepo/) o Protein Variation Effect Analyzer (PROVEAN) (http://provean.jcvi.org/) (Choi & Chan, 2015) o Mutationtaster (http://mutationtaster.org/) (Schwarz et al, 2014) o PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) (Adzhubei et al, 2013) o Human Splicing Finder (http://www.umd.be/HSF3/index.html/) (Desmet et al, 2009) o MaxEntScan (http://hollywood.mit.edu/burgelab/maxent/Xmaxentscan_scoreseq.html) (Yeo & Burge, 2004) o NNSPLICE (http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html) (Reese et al, 1997) o SpliceAI (https://github.com/Illumina/SpliceAI) (Jaganathan et al, 2019) o subRVIS (http://subrvis.org/) (Gussow et al, 2016) o Pathogenic Variant Enriched Regions (PER) viewer (http://per.broadinstitute.org/) (Pérez-Palma et al, 2019;Perez-Palma et al, 2020) o Constrained Coding Regions (CCRs) Browser (http://www.rebrand.ly/ccrregions/) (Havrilla et al, 2019) o MISCAST (http://miscast.broadinstitute.org/) (Iqbal et al, 2019) o Rare Exome Variant Ensembl Learner (REVEL) (https://sites.google.com/site/revelgenomics/) (Ioannidis et al, 2016) o ClinPred (https://sites.google.com/site/clinpred/) (Alirezaie et al, 2018)  Other useful tools: o alleleFrequencyApp (https://www.cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/) (Whiffin et al, 2017) o Automatic PVS1 interpretation (AutoPVS1) tool (http://autopvs1.genetics.bgi.com/) (Xiang et al, 2019) o MedCalc (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php/) o InterVar (http://wintervar.wglab.org/) (Q.…”
Section:  Variant Nomenclature Verification Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SVI suggested using a PVS1 decision tree to determine the LoF effect of a variant in the context of gene structure and molecular etiology, such as alternative splicing or nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) (Abou Tayoun et al, 2018). An automatic PVS1 interpretation (AutoPVS1) tool (Xiang et al, 2019) has been developed online to facilitate determining the PVS1 strength level for null variants. .…”
Section: Variant Type Specific Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%