Abstract:Various metabolic pathways and molecular processes in the cell act intertwined, and dysregulating the interplay between some of them may lead to cancer. It is only recently that defects in the translation process, i.e., the synthesis of proteins by the ribosome using a messenger (m)RNA as a template and translation factors, have begun to gain strong attention as a cause of autophagy dysregulation with effects in different maladies, including cancer. Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic process th… Show more
“…3A, B). Many autophagy inducers require eIF2α phosphorylation as a mandatory step for the ignition of the process 48 . Accordingly, we observed that a knockin mutation that renders eIF2α non-phosphorylatable (due to the replacement of serine in position 51 by an alanine residue: genotype eIF2α S51A/S51A ) strongly inhibited the induction of GFP-LC3 puncta by AZT, CQ, and HCQ ( Fig.…”
Section: Lysosomotropic Agents Induce Eif2a Phosphorylation In Vitromentioning
The integrated stress response manifests with the phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) on serine residue 51 and plays a major role in the adaptation of cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress in the initiation of autophagy and in the ignition of immune responses. Here, we report that lysosomotropic agents, including azithromycin, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine, can trigger eIF2α phosphorylation in vitro (in cultured human cells) and, as validated for hydroxychloroquine, in vivo (in mice). Cells bearing a non-phosphorylatable eIF2α mutant (S51A) failed to accumulate autophagic puncta in response to azithromycin, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine. Conversely, two inhibitors of eIF2α dephosphorylation, nelfinavir and salubrinal, enhanced the induction of such autophagic puncta. Altogether, these results point to the unexpected capacity of azithromycin, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine to elicit the integrated stress response.
“…3A, B). Many autophagy inducers require eIF2α phosphorylation as a mandatory step for the ignition of the process 48 . Accordingly, we observed that a knockin mutation that renders eIF2α non-phosphorylatable (due to the replacement of serine in position 51 by an alanine residue: genotype eIF2α S51A/S51A ) strongly inhibited the induction of GFP-LC3 puncta by AZT, CQ, and HCQ ( Fig.…”
Section: Lysosomotropic Agents Induce Eif2a Phosphorylation In Vitromentioning
The integrated stress response manifests with the phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) on serine residue 51 and plays a major role in the adaptation of cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress in the initiation of autophagy and in the ignition of immune responses. Here, we report that lysosomotropic agents, including azithromycin, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine, can trigger eIF2α phosphorylation in vitro (in cultured human cells) and, as validated for hydroxychloroquine, in vivo (in mice). Cells bearing a non-phosphorylatable eIF2α mutant (S51A) failed to accumulate autophagic puncta in response to azithromycin, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine. Conversely, two inhibitors of eIF2α dephosphorylation, nelfinavir and salubrinal, enhanced the induction of such autophagic puncta. Altogether, these results point to the unexpected capacity of azithromycin, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine to elicit the integrated stress response.
“…The main objective of autophagy or “self-eating” (Greek meaning) is to break down cytoplasmic components like macromolecules and organelles, in order to sustain cellular metabolism and to ensure cellular homeostasis [ 16 , 38 , 39 ]. Some people described autophagy as a cellular “re-cycling process” that digests old and unwanted substances and turns it into useful nutrients for cellular usage [ 25 ].…”
Section: Autophagy Types and Process And Functional Roles Of Autophamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some people described autophagy as a cellular “re-cycling process” that digests old and unwanted substances and turns it into useful nutrients for cellular usage [ 25 ]. Autophagy is important to avoid the accumulation of harmful substances like precipitated proteins, damaged cellular organelles and oncogenic materials that could pose danger to the cells [ 38 , 39 ]. The failures to eliminate these unnecessary, aged or toxic substances would trigger intracellular inflammation which would generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequently, these cellular processes would lead to the development of cellular degeneration, apoptosis and carcinogenesis [ 38 – 40 ].…”
Section: Autophagy Types and Process And Functional Roles Of Autophamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macroautophagy is an evolutionarily, highly conserved and common type of autophagy that involves the sequestration of a portion of a cellular organelle to form autophagosome [ 41 ]. Lysosome then fuses with the autophagosome to form autolysosome in which the macromolecules like proteins and organelles to be degraded will be digested within the autolysosome [ 39 ]. Selective macroautophagy is a specific type of autophagy in which selected dysfunctional cellular organelles or substrates will be recognized and selected for autophagy [ 38 ].…”
Section: Autophagy Types and Process And Functional Roles Of Autophamentioning
Breast cancer is the most common solid cancer that affects female population globally. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNAs that can regulate post-transcriptional modification of multiple downstream genes. Autophagy is a conserved cellular catabolic activity that aims to provide nutrients and degrade un-usable macromolecules in mammalian cells. A number of in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies have reported that some miRNAs could modulate autophagy activity in human breast cancer cells, and these would influence human breast cancer progression and treatment response. Therefore, this review was aimed to discuss the roles of autophagy-regulating miRNAs in influencing breast cancer development and treatment response. The review would first introduce autophagy types and process, followed by the discussion of the roles of different miRNAs in modulating autophagy in human breast cancer, and to explore how would this miRNA-autophagy regulatory process affect the disease progression or treatment response. Lastly, the potential applications and challenges of utilizing autophagy-regulating miRNAs as breast cancer biomarkers and novel therapeutic agents would be discussed.
“…Autophagy is besides apoptosis another catabolic pathway essential in homeostasis of cells [ 125 ]. Both mechanisms are interconnected by several molecular nodes and a close cross-talk exists [ 54 ].…”
Non-coding RNAs are important regulators of differentiation during embryogenesis as well as key players in the fine-tuning of transcription and furthermore, they control the post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs under physiological conditions. Deregulated expression of non-coding RNAs is often identified as one major contribution in a number of pathological conditions. Non-coding RNAs are a heterogenous group of RNAs and they represent the majority of nuclear transcripts in eukaryotes. An evolutionary highly conserved sub-group of non-coding RNAs is represented by vault RNAs, named since firstly discovered as component of the largest known ribonucleoprotein complexes called “vault”. Although they have been initially described 30 years ago, vault RNAs are largely unknown and their molecular role is still under investigation. In this review we will summarize the known functions of vault RNAs and their involvement in cellular mechanisms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.