2021
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autophagic Markers in Chordomas: Immunohistochemical Analysis and Comparison with the Immune Microenvironment of Chordoma Tissues

Abstract: Chordomas are notably resistant to chemotherapy. One of the cytoprotective mechanisms implicated in chemoresistance is autophagy. There are indirect data that autophagy could be implicated in chordomas, but its presence has not been studied in chordoma tissues. Sixty-one (61) chordomas were immunohistochemically studied for autophagic markers and their expression was compared with the expression in notochords, clinicopathological data, as well as the tumor immune microenvironment. All chordomas strongly and di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 39 Additionally, a recent IHC analysis showed positive expression of autophagic markers LC3B, P62 and ATG16L1 in chordoma compared with normal notochords, which revealed the potential oncogenic role of autophagy in chordoma. 32 Consistent with prior observations, we found positive expression of ATG5, a vital ATG during autophagy, in chordoma, especially recurrent chordoma, and identified ATG5 as a novel adverse prognostic factor of chordoma patients. Additionally, our in vitro data suggested impairments of proliferation, migration and invasion of chordoma cells after blocking autophagy by ATG5 siRNA or autophagy inhibitor CQ, revealing the tumour promotive effect of autophagy in chordoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 39 Additionally, a recent IHC analysis showed positive expression of autophagic markers LC3B, P62 and ATG16L1 in chordoma compared with normal notochords, which revealed the potential oncogenic role of autophagy in chordoma. 32 Consistent with prior observations, we found positive expression of ATG5, a vital ATG during autophagy, in chordoma, especially recurrent chordoma, and identified ATG5 as a novel adverse prognostic factor of chordoma patients. Additionally, our in vitro data suggested impairments of proliferation, migration and invasion of chordoma cells after blocking autophagy by ATG5 siRNA or autophagy inhibitor CQ, revealing the tumour promotive effect of autophagy in chordoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The IHC score of ATG5 was evaluated under a Leica Aperio AT2 scanner and defined as the product of the score of positive tumour cells as a percentage (0, no positive tumour cells; 1+, less than 25% cells; 2+, 25%‐50% cells; 3+, >50% cells) × the score of the staining intensity (0, no staining; 1+, weak, light yellow; 2+, moderate, yellow‐brown; 3+, strong, brown). 31 , 32 Low ATG5 expression was defined as an IHC score of <4, and IHC scores of ≥4 were defined as high ATG5 expression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of proteins affecting immunity includes autophagic proteins. It is known that the PD-L1 positive cells express LC3B, suggesting the need for further investigations regarding autophagy and the immune microenvironment [10][11][12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of proteins affecting immunity includes autophagic proteins. It is known the PD-L1 positive cells express LC3B, suggesting the need for further investigation into the modulation of the immune microenvironment [10]. However, misfolded proteins, damaged mitochondria, and other unwanted components in cells can be decomposed and reused via autophagy in some specific cases (including hypoxic stress, low energy states, or nutrient deprivation) [11].…”
Section: Of 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antibodies were initially tested in a large variety of normal and neoplastic tissues to decide the best immunohistochemical protocol giving no background staining and a range of staining intensities 14 . Thereafter, nerve fibers and normal tonsillar tissue were used as positive controls for LC3B and p62 15 , respectively, as well as tonsillar tissue for M6PR, while omission of the primary antibody was used as a negative control 14 . Normal brain tissue also served as an internal positive control for LC3B and p62 in the current series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%