Maintaining Control 2009
DOI: 10.5790/hongkong/9789622099234.003.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomy and control in curriculum development: ‘Are you teaching what we all agreed?’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This clearly shows how difficult it is to implement principles of learner autonomy on a curricular level -a challenge that every attempt to foster learner autonomy has to stand. The difficulty of curriculum reform for autonomy has also been confirmed by Nix and Barfield (2009), who have described their experience with the implementation of a literacyfocused English curriculum at a Japanese university.…”
Section: Curriculum-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This clearly shows how difficult it is to implement principles of learner autonomy on a curricular level -a challenge that every attempt to foster learner autonomy has to stand. The difficulty of curriculum reform for autonomy has also been confirmed by Nix and Barfield (2009), who have described their experience with the implementation of a literacyfocused English curriculum at a Japanese university.…”
Section: Curriculum-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Many studies have been done on the issue of project work in promoting learner autonomy (e.g. Ramírez, 2014;Nix, 2003;Stephenson & Kohyama, 2003). Ramírez (2014) conducted an action research study on promoting learner autonomy through project work in an English for Specific Purposes class at a Colombian regional and public university.…”
Section: Curriculum-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of S's relationships with the course coordinators, in other words, resembles that of supervisors and subordinates, with the former being able to closely monitor and influence the latter's professional practice. This type of relationship can be detrimental to teacher autonomy development because it does not allow teachers to take ownership of their practices or experiment with new approaches to teaching and learning (Nix & Barfield, 2009). Although teachers, in principle, should question the status quo and confront constraints on their teaching (Jiménez Raya & Vieira, 2015;Smith & Erdoğan, 2008), S knew that doing so in his context would invite unnecessary scrutiny from his department which in turn could further undermine his autonomy.…”
Section: Factors That Support and Constrain Teacher Autonomy In The E...mentioning
confidence: 99%