2020
DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous vehicles, human agency and the potential of urban life

Abstract: Research on autonomous vehicles has hitherto been largely concerned with its technological infrastructure, and with the management of smart transport systems in urban space. While there is a growing body of work on the sociological perspectives of autonomous vehicles, it has tended to remain technocentric, focusing on how self-driving innovations have an effect on cities and urban lives. By thinking through the notions of sensation, action, and encounter, this paper advances a reconceptualisation of autonomous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on driverless vehicles is relatively well developed within the technological field, whilst social science research on the likes of users' experiences with driverless vehicles and the societal opportunities and risks of the technology are limited (Yeo and Lin, 2020). Existing studies that investigate user perspectives often focus on "user acceptance" (see Nordhoff et al, 2017).…”
Section: Engagement In Urban Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on driverless vehicles is relatively well developed within the technological field, whilst social science research on the likes of users' experiences with driverless vehicles and the societal opportunities and risks of the technology are limited (Yeo and Lin, 2020). Existing studies that investigate user perspectives often focus on "user acceptance" (see Nordhoff et al, 2017).…”
Section: Engagement In Urban Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, letting the user know the systems’ intentions ( Le Goff et al, 2018 ), giving the user the ultimate decision on what to do ( Heer, 2019 ) or regulating the level of assistance ( Berberian et al, 2012 ). Some examples of intelligent systems that preserve the user’s SoA are cars, machinery and aircrafts that allow the operator to choose whether to take control or delegate it to the system ( Yeo and Lin, 2020 ). Indeed the SoA has been suggested to objectively evaluate the quality of human-in-the-loop control for assistive technologies ( Endo et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Horvarth examined how the rise in the automobile claimed much of our cities as "machine space," restricting access for nonmotorized vehicles (Horvath, 1974). Others have considered how "software-sorting" (Graham, 2005) and "automated management" (Dodge & Kitchin, 2007) have modulated activity inside and outside the vehicle, rendering and reinforcing existing social and geographical inequalities throughout the city (Yeo & Lin, 2020). Yet rather than a scalar, geographical perspective that considers the effect of the platformization of automobility on society at large, we consider here some key elements of what the ongoing process of platformization actually looks like as it is overcoming automakers and the automotive industry.…”
Section: Media and Automobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%