2023
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2022.3174511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous Vehicle Kinematics and Dynamics Synthesis for Sideslip Angle Estimation Based on Consensus Kalman Filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on AVs’ nonlinear characteristics and parameter uncertainty, researchers in recent studies proposed some novel kinematic model-based and robust fusion methods for localization and state estimation (velocity and attitude) to ensure high accuracy and reliability by integrating different sensing and measuring units such as a global navigation satellite system (GNSS), camera, LiDAR simultaneous localization and mapping (LiDAR-SLAM), and inertial measurement unit (IMU) [ 19 ]. The sideslip angle estimation and measurement under severe conditions are one of the challenging sections of AV research in ITS where the researchers are proposed different approaches and models such as automated vehicle sideslip angle estimation considering signal measurement characteristics [ 20 ], autonomous vehicle kinematics and dynamics synthesis for sideslip angle estimation based on the consensus Kalman filter [ 21 ], vision-aided intelligent vehicle sideslip angle estimation based on a dynamic model [ 22 ], and IMU-based automated vehicle body sideslip angle and attitude estimation aided by GNSS using parallel adaptive Kalman filters [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The main challenges of those types of integrated fusion are high latency, measurement delay, and less reliability for long-distance communication in various driving conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on AVs’ nonlinear characteristics and parameter uncertainty, researchers in recent studies proposed some novel kinematic model-based and robust fusion methods for localization and state estimation (velocity and attitude) to ensure high accuracy and reliability by integrating different sensing and measuring units such as a global navigation satellite system (GNSS), camera, LiDAR simultaneous localization and mapping (LiDAR-SLAM), and inertial measurement unit (IMU) [ 19 ]. The sideslip angle estimation and measurement under severe conditions are one of the challenging sections of AV research in ITS where the researchers are proposed different approaches and models such as automated vehicle sideslip angle estimation considering signal measurement characteristics [ 20 ], autonomous vehicle kinematics and dynamics synthesis for sideslip angle estimation based on the consensus Kalman filter [ 21 ], vision-aided intelligent vehicle sideslip angle estimation based on a dynamic model [ 22 ], and IMU-based automated vehicle body sideslip angle and attitude estimation aided by GNSS using parallel adaptive Kalman filters [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The main challenges of those types of integrated fusion are high latency, measurement delay, and less reliability for long-distance communication in various driving conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kalman filter combines vehicle states obtained from vehicle kinematics and dynamics to improve the reliability and accuracy of autonomous driving. A consensus−based and vehicle kinematics/dynamics integrated autonomous vehicle sideslip angle estimation algorithm based on GNSS/INS was proposed [ 26 , 27 ]. Madyastha [ 28 ] proposed a Kalman filtering method based on attitude error states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these states could only be obtained through specific equipment. To this end, researchers have designed robust estimators by integrating cameras, global navigation satellite system (GNSS), and inertial measurement unit (IMU) [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. These techniques could be used in the future whole-vehicle test verification of our proposed approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%