2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous surface crack identification of concrete structures based on an improved one-stage object detection algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the overall success of our research, it was essential to provide a comparison against similar studies conducted in recent years. Table 6 presents a comparison of our method with those in [ 14 , 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to evaluate the overall success of our research, it was essential to provide a comparison against similar studies conducted in recent years. Table 6 presents a comparison of our method with those in [ 14 , 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [ 14 ], based on a two-stage detector, identified no better balance between detection accuracy and speed, while [ 29 ] based on a one-stage detector, they reported better performance in detection accuracy and speed. Although our method had a lower mAP than [ 29 ], the difference was minimal and around 2.4%. In addition, our results presented a faster calculation speed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Machine learning (ML) approaches have been introduced in the field of structural property prediction and damage detection. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Damage detection using ML techniques often requires a procedure of feature extraction followed by damage classification. For feature extraction, structural modal parameters are used in ML-based parametric damage detection methods 24 ; in ML-based non-parametric damage detection methods, multiple features can be defined by users and extracted through different techniques, such as statistical analysis, 25 regression analysis, 26 principal component analysis, 27 and wavelet transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-of-the-art DL models account for unforeseen scenarios by considering data for different environmental, optical, and structural variabilities. Holistic reviews of AI-based automated surface crack classifications are provided in [ 34 , 36 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based architectures used for crack detection are briefly overviewed in [ 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%