AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-6383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous Star Tracker Performance for the New Horizons Mission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nominal passive drift rate once an attitude has been achieved is 5 s −1 (Conard et al 2017), though analysis of images suggests it is frequently significantly better (Zemcov et al 2017). Details of the attitude control system can be found in Rogers et al (2006) and Fountain et al (2008). In addition to the attitude control performance, the propellant required to point the spacecraft is a limiting factor to the observations performed during any extended mission.…”
Section: Attitude Control Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nominal passive drift rate once an attitude has been achieved is 5 s −1 (Conard et al 2017), though analysis of images suggests it is frequently significantly better (Zemcov et al 2017). Details of the attitude control system can be found in Rogers et al (2006) and Fountain et al (2008). In addition to the attitude control performance, the propellant required to point the spacecraft is a limiting factor to the observations performed during any extended mission.…”
Section: Attitude Control Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nominal passive drift rate once an attitude has been achieved is 5″ s −1 (Conard et al 2017), though analysis of images suggests it is frequently significantly better (Zemcov et al 2017). Details of the attitude control system can be found in Rogers et al (2006) and Fountain et al (2008).…”
Section: Attitude Control Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%