Autonomous signal source displacement detection and recalibration of fingerprinting-based indoor localization systems

Fet, Ngewi; Handte, Marcus; Marrón, Pedro José

doi:10.1109/ipin.2017.8115906

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An illustrative example of the evaluation diversity problem can be found in two works presented at the 2017 IPIN conference [ 38 , 39 ]. The former shows the evaluation results in some corridors (inside an area of ≈

, with 90 reference points), whereas the latter shows results in an office (11.5 × 28 m

, 5 APs and 1645 calibration fingerprints), a trade fair (3422 m 2 and 18 APs) and a warehouse (826.32 m 2 and 70 Bluetooth beacons).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Off-Line Evaluation of Mobile-Centric Indoor Positioning Systems: The Experiences from the 2017 IPIN Competition

Torres-Sospedra

Jiménez

Moreira

et al. 2018

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of indoor positioning solutions using smartphones is a growing activity with an enormous potential for everyday life and professional applications. The research activities on this topic concentrate on the development of new positioning solutions that are tested in specific environments under their own evaluation metrics. To explore the real positioning quality of smartphone-based solutions and their capabilities for seamlessly adapting to different scenarios, it is needed to find fair evaluation frameworks. The design of competitions using extensive pre-recorded datasets is a valid way to generate open data for comparing the different solutions created by research teams. In this paper, we discuss the details of the 2017 IPIN indoor localization competition, the different datasets created, the teams participating in the event, and the results they obtained. We compare these results with other competition-based approaches (Microsoft and Perf-loc) and on-line evaluation web sites. The lessons learned by organising these competitions and the benefits for the community are addressed along the paper. Our analysis paves the way for future developments on the standardization of evaluations and for creating a widely-adopted benchmark strategy for researchers and companies in the field.

show abstract

, with 90 reference points), whereas the latter shows results in an office (11.5 × 28 m

, 5 APs and 1645 calibration fingerprints), a trade fair (3422 m 2 and 18 APs) and a warehouse (826.32 m 2 and 70 Bluetooth beacons).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%