Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy V 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2311718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous on-board data processing and instrument calibration software for the SO/PHI

Abstract: The extension of on-board data processing capabilities is an attractive option to reduce telemetry for scientific instruments on deep space missions. The challenges that this presents, however, require a comprehensive software system, which operates on the limited resources a data processing unit in space allows. We implemented such a system for the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (PHI) on-board the Solar Orbiter (SO) spacecraft. It ensures autonomous operation to handle long command-response times, easy … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical mode of HELIX + inverts the data with varying starting conditions, and we regard the variation of the results as a measure of the inaccuracy inherent in the inversion of the data set, amounting to 21.9 G, 1.34 • , 1.37 • , and 14.5 m/s for | B|, γ, φ and v LOS , respectively. The errors in the inversion results, introduced to the SDO/HMI data by the on-board processing of SO/PHI (Albert et al, 2019), are 33.64 G, 2.56 • , 1.92 • , and 19 m/s for the same parameters, which are slightly higher than what we find in the current study. This is due to the different input data, as well as the earlier version of the processing pipeline.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The statistical mode of HELIX + inverts the data with varying starting conditions, and we regard the variation of the results as a measure of the inaccuracy inherent in the inversion of the data set, amounting to 21.9 G, 1.34 • , 1.37 • , and 14.5 m/s for | B|, γ, φ and v LOS , respectively. The errors in the inversion results, introduced to the SDO/HMI data by the on-board processing of SO/PHI (Albert et al, 2019), are 33.64 G, 2.56 • , 1.92 • , and 19 m/s for the same parameters, which are slightly higher than what we find in the current study. This is due to the different input data, as well as the earlier version of the processing pipeline.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…In Albert et al (2019) we have done a similar analysis on a data set acquired by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on-board the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO/HMI; Schou et al, 2012), using an earlier version of the SO/PHI data reduction pipeline. In that study, we compared the errors from the processing to a statistical analysis performed with the He-Line Information Extractor inversion code (HELIX + ; see Lagg et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, because of its role in a deep-space mission with limited telemetry, SO/PHI is designed to autonomously process and conduct a full scientific analysis onboard. This functionality is achieved by a specifically tailored software (Albert et al 2018(Albert et al , 2020 and a newly designed device, the electronic inverter of the radiative transfer equation (RTE) for polarized light (Cobos Carrascosa 2016;Cobos Carrascosa et al 2016). The recorded and the processed data both undergo compression using conventional procedures before they are downlinked (Hernández Expósito et al 2018).…”
Section: Overview Of the So/phi And Sdo/hmi Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the processing of the data also happens on-board. This is due to the difficulties imposed by the telemetry limitations present in SO orbit (Albert et al, 2018).…”
Section: Imaging Detectors For Solar Spectropolarimetermentioning
confidence: 99%