2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomous mobile robot navigation system designed in dynamic environment based on transferable belief model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By appropriate procedures and definitions, the robot dynamics can be transformed as Yaonan et al [3] Predictive control strategy based on ELM 3…”
Section: Intelligent Automation and Soft Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By appropriate procedures and definitions, the robot dynamics can be transformed as Yaonan et al [3] Predictive control strategy based on ELM 3…”
Section: Intelligent Automation and Soft Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, using a kinematic model of nonholonomic mobile robots, various approaches such as backstepping [1], neural networks [2][3][4][5], neural-fuzzy [6] have been proposed to solve the tracking problem. Considering the dynamics model, research has been proposed to achieve trajectory tracking of a mobile robot with nonholonomic constraints [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial potential field (APF) [6,14,[19][20][21][22][23][24] is one of the most commonly used schemes in the field of MR navigation [18]. In the work of Ge and Cui [20], the authors apply APF in a dynamic environment containing a moving target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the problem of avoiding collisions in dynamic environment is much harder. Several works have been developed for dynamic environments like velocity obstacles (Fiorini and Shiller, 1998;Large et al, 2005), collision cones (Chakravarthy and Ghose, 1998), the rolling window method (Zhang and Xi, 2003), inevitable collision state (Fraichard and Asama, 2004), the prediction model for beam curvature method (Shi et al, 2010), and other methods (Jaradata et al, 2011;Yaonana and Yimin, 2011;Zhu and Hua, 2011;Zhong et al, 2014;Bis et al, 2012). This paper is organised as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%