Abstract:Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate potential differences in autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity to emotional stimuli between preschool-age children who do (CWS) and do not stutter (CWNS).
Methods
Participants were 20 preschool-age CWS (15 male) and 21 preschool-age CWNS (11 male). Participants were exposed to two emotion-inducing video clips (negative and positive) with neutral clips used to establish pre-and post-arousal baselines, and followed by age-appropriate speaking tasks. Respir… Show more
“…H = Hypothesis; solid arrow = significant path relations; dotted arrow = nonsignificant path relations. Buhr, et al (2014) reported that preschool-age CWS displayed a significant positive relation between parasympathetic activity indexed by respiratory sinus arrhythmia and sympathetic activity indexed by SCL. In other words, for young CWS, both parasympathetic and sympathetic activities were coactivated (i.e., higher sympathetic activity and higher parasympathetic), which is not typically expected.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We speculate that such changes may be one possible mediator between emotional diathesis or emotional stress and stuttering. Given that sympathetic arousal has been reported to be associated with emotional diathesis (Fowles, Kochanska, & Murray, 2000;Jones, Buhr, et al, 2014) as well as emotional stress (Kreibig, 2010) and that sympathetic arousal has been studied in relation to stuttering (e.g., Adams & Moore, 1972;Ickes & Pierce, 1973;Jones, Buhr, et al, 2014;Weber & Smith, 1990), such speculation seems reasonable, and sympathetic arousal may one good candidate for a mediator. Such mediation possibly accounts for, at least in part, how emotional diathesis and/or emotional stress may be associated with stuttering.…”
Section: How Might Emotion and Stuttering Be Related?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were part of an ongoing series of empirical investigations of linguistic and emotional contributors to developmental stuttering (e.g., Arnold et al, 2011;Clark, Conture, Frankel, & Walden, 2012;Clark, Conture, Walden, & Lambert, 2013K. Johnson et al, 2010;Jones, Buhr, et al, 2014;Ntourou et al, 2013;Tumanova, Conture, Lambert, & Walden, 2014;Zengin-Bolatkale, Conture, & Walden, 2015) conducted by the Vanderbilt University Developmental Stuttering Project. The study's protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Vanderbilt University.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one possible factor that could suppress the influence of sympathetic arousal on stuttering would be parasympathetic activity (i.e., physiological correlate of emotion regulation) that may occur concurrently with sympathetic arousal (Alm, 2004;Berntson, Cacioppo, & Quigley, 1991;Jones, Buhr, et al, 2014). For the present study, therefore, the mediational analysis was performed on the basis of this more recent reasoning.…”
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine (a) whether emotional reactivity and emotional stress of children who stutter (CWS) are associated with their stuttering frequency, (b) when the relationship between emotional reactivity and stuttering frequency is more likely to exist, and (c) how these associations are mediated by a 3rd variable (e.g., sympathetic arousal).
Method
Participants were 47 young CWS (
M
age = 50.69 months,
SD
= 10.34). Measurement of participants' emotional reactivity was based on parental report, and emotional stress was engendered by viewing baseline, positive, and negative emotion-inducing video clips, with stuttered disfluencies and sympathetic arousal (indexed by tonic skin conductance level) measured during a narrative after viewing each of the various video clips.
Results
CWS's positive emotional reactivity was positively associated with percentage of their stuttered disfluencies regardless of emotional stress condition. CWS's negative emotional reactivity was more positively correlated with percentage of stuttered disfluencies during a narrative after a positive, compared with baseline, emotional stress condition. CWS's sympathetic arousal did not appear to mediate the effect of emotional reactivity, emotional stress condition, and their interaction on percentage of stuttered disfluencies, at least during this experimental narrative task following emotion-inducing video clips.
Conclusions
Results were taken to suggest an association between young CWS's positive emotional reactivity and stuttering, with negative reactivity seemingly more associated with these children's stuttering during positive emotional stress (a stress condition possibly associated with lesser degrees of emotion regulation). Such findings seem to support the notion that emotional processes warrant inclusion in any truly comprehensive account of childhood stuttering.
“…H = Hypothesis; solid arrow = significant path relations; dotted arrow = nonsignificant path relations. Buhr, et al (2014) reported that preschool-age CWS displayed a significant positive relation between parasympathetic activity indexed by respiratory sinus arrhythmia and sympathetic activity indexed by SCL. In other words, for young CWS, both parasympathetic and sympathetic activities were coactivated (i.e., higher sympathetic activity and higher parasympathetic), which is not typically expected.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We speculate that such changes may be one possible mediator between emotional diathesis or emotional stress and stuttering. Given that sympathetic arousal has been reported to be associated with emotional diathesis (Fowles, Kochanska, & Murray, 2000;Jones, Buhr, et al, 2014) as well as emotional stress (Kreibig, 2010) and that sympathetic arousal has been studied in relation to stuttering (e.g., Adams & Moore, 1972;Ickes & Pierce, 1973;Jones, Buhr, et al, 2014;Weber & Smith, 1990), such speculation seems reasonable, and sympathetic arousal may one good candidate for a mediator. Such mediation possibly accounts for, at least in part, how emotional diathesis and/or emotional stress may be associated with stuttering.…”
Section: How Might Emotion and Stuttering Be Related?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were part of an ongoing series of empirical investigations of linguistic and emotional contributors to developmental stuttering (e.g., Arnold et al, 2011;Clark, Conture, Frankel, & Walden, 2012;Clark, Conture, Walden, & Lambert, 2013K. Johnson et al, 2010;Jones, Buhr, et al, 2014;Ntourou et al, 2013;Tumanova, Conture, Lambert, & Walden, 2014;Zengin-Bolatkale, Conture, & Walden, 2015) conducted by the Vanderbilt University Developmental Stuttering Project. The study's protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Vanderbilt University.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one possible factor that could suppress the influence of sympathetic arousal on stuttering would be parasympathetic activity (i.e., physiological correlate of emotion regulation) that may occur concurrently with sympathetic arousal (Alm, 2004;Berntson, Cacioppo, & Quigley, 1991;Jones, Buhr, et al, 2014). For the present study, therefore, the mediational analysis was performed on the basis of this more recent reasoning.…”
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine (a) whether emotional reactivity and emotional stress of children who stutter (CWS) are associated with their stuttering frequency, (b) when the relationship between emotional reactivity and stuttering frequency is more likely to exist, and (c) how these associations are mediated by a 3rd variable (e.g., sympathetic arousal).
Method
Participants were 47 young CWS (
M
age = 50.69 months,
SD
= 10.34). Measurement of participants' emotional reactivity was based on parental report, and emotional stress was engendered by viewing baseline, positive, and negative emotion-inducing video clips, with stuttered disfluencies and sympathetic arousal (indexed by tonic skin conductance level) measured during a narrative after viewing each of the various video clips.
Results
CWS's positive emotional reactivity was positively associated with percentage of their stuttered disfluencies regardless of emotional stress condition. CWS's negative emotional reactivity was more positively correlated with percentage of stuttered disfluencies during a narrative after a positive, compared with baseline, emotional stress condition. CWS's sympathetic arousal did not appear to mediate the effect of emotional reactivity, emotional stress condition, and their interaction on percentage of stuttered disfluencies, at least during this experimental narrative task following emotion-inducing video clips.
Conclusions
Results were taken to suggest an association between young CWS's positive emotional reactivity and stuttering, with negative reactivity seemingly more associated with these children's stuttering during positive emotional stress (a stress condition possibly associated with lesser degrees of emotion regulation). Such findings seem to support the notion that emotional processes warrant inclusion in any truly comprehensive account of childhood stuttering.
“…Data were previously collected as part of an ongoing series of empirical investigations of linguistic and emotional associates of childhood stuttering conducted by Vanderbilt University's Developmental Stuttering Project (e.g., Arnold, Conture, Key, & Walden, 2011;Choi, Conture, Walden, Lambert, & Tumanova, 2013;Clark, Conture, Frankel, & Walden, 2012;Johnson, Walden, Conture, & Karrass, 2010;Jones et al, 2014;Millager et al, 2014;Richels et al, 2010;Walden et al, 2012). Children were paid volunteers whose caregivers learned of the study from (a) a free monthly parent magazine circulated throughout middle Tennessee, (b) a local health care provider, or (c) self-or professional referral to the Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Hearing and Speech Center for an evaluation.…”
Purpose: This study investigated the relation among speech-language dissociations, attentional distractibility, and childhood stuttering. Method: Participants were 82 preschool-age children who stutter (CWS) and 120 who do not stutter (CWNS). Correlationbased statistics (Bates, Appelbaum, Salcedo, Saygin, & Pizzamiglio, 2003) identified dissociations across 5 normbased speech-language subtests. The Behavioral Style Questionnaire Distractibility subscale measured attentional distractibility. Analyses addressed (a) between-groups differences in the number of children exhibiting speechlanguage dissociations; (b) between-groups distractibility differences; (c) the relation between distractibility and speech-language dissociations; and (d) whether interactions between distractibility and dissociations predicted the frequency of total, stuttered, and nonstuttered disfluencies.Results: More preschool-age CWS exhibited speechlanguage dissociations compared with CWNS, and more boys exhibited dissociations compared with girls. In addition, male CWS were less distractible than female CWS and female CWNS. For CWS, but not CWNS, less distractibility (i.e., greater attention) was associated with more speechlanguage dissociations. Last, interactions between distractibility and dissociations did not predict speech disfluencies in CWS or CWNS.Conclusions: The present findings suggest that for preschool-age CWS, attentional processes are associated with speech-language dissociations. Future investigations are warranted to better understand the directionality of effect of this association (e.g., inefficient attentional processes → speech-language dissociations vs. inefficient attentional processes ← speech-language dissociations).
The study presented in the following verifies some assumptions of the novel ‘unsafe world’ model of selective mutism (SM). According to this model, SM is a stress reaction to situations erroneously experienced via cognition without awareness as ‘unsafe’. It assumes a high sensitivity to unsafety, whereby the nervous system triggers dissociation or freeze mode at relatively low thresholds. We examine whether there is a correlation between SM, sensory-processing sensitivity and dissociation. We compared a sample of 28 children and adolescents with SM (mean age 12.66 years; 18 females) to 33 controls without SM (mean age 12.45 years; 21 females). Both groups were compared using a medical history sheet, the ‘Selective Mutism Questionnaire’ (SMQ), a ‘Checklist for Speaking Behaviour’ (CheckS), the ‘Highly Sensitive Person Scale’ (HSPS), the ‘Child Dissociative Checklist’ (CDC), the ‘Adolescent Dissociative Experience Scale’ (A-DES) and the ‘Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory for Children’ (SPAIK). Appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests were conducted to examine differences between groups. The results indicate that sensory-processing sensitivity was significantly higher in the group of children and adolescents with SM [X2(1) = 7.224, p = 0.0007; d = 1.092]. Furthermore, dissociative symptoms were more common in children and adolescents with SM than in controls [F(1, 33) = 13.004, p = 0.001; d = 0.986]. The results indicate that sensory-processing sensitivity and dissociation are important factors of SM that may hold important implications for the treatment.
Trial Registration
This study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04233905.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.