2009 6th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ccnc.2009.4784696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomic Management for Capacity Improvement in Wireless Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gateways that successfully carry out an offload procedure and become "off" correspond to downward curves, while Gateways that associate relocated WSs see their throughput grow. A sample of a successful offload can be observed in the interval [3,4] s where a Gateway, upon switching itself off, relocates its three WSs to two other Gateways whose throughput therefore increases. Eventually (at t=8.5 s), the federated network settles at 3 "on" Gateways out of 10.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Gateways that successfully carry out an offload procedure and become "off" correspond to downward curves, while Gateways that associate relocated WSs see their throughput grow. A sample of a successful offload can be observed in the interval [3,4] s where a Gateway, upon switching itself off, relocates its three WSs to two other Gateways whose throughput therefore increases. Eventually (at t=8.5 s), the federated network settles at 3 "on" Gateways out of 10.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we consider a different traffic scenario where initially all 10 Gateways serve the same number of WSs (namely, 2, 4,6). Each WS generates a UDP flow with the same offered load, which is a varying parameter in different test runs.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation