1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)34239-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autonomic innervation of the rat vagina, cervix, and uterus and its cyclic variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
51
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
14
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggestion is supported by the histochemical demonstration of dense acetylcholinesterase-staining in the present study and by other workers (Adham & Schenk, 1969;Hervonen et aL, 1973). Nakanishi & Wood (1971) by atropine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This suggestion is supported by the histochemical demonstration of dense acetylcholinesterase-staining in the present study and by other workers (Adham & Schenk, 1969;Hervonen et aL, 1973). Nakanishi & Wood (1971) by atropine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Decreased gastrointestinal motility and constipation are well known consequences of treatment with atropine (lIenderson & Roepke, 1937;Ambache, 1955) and ganglion blocking agents (Paton & Zaimis, 1951). Cholinesterase inhibition, on the other hand, increases gut motility due to the accumulation of acetylcholine (Holmstedt, 1959) (Adham & Schenk, 1969;Silva, 1966). This would go along with the low level of acetylcholinesterase activity which was found in the uterus in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Hormonal changes may in¯uence the innervation of vagina. Adham and Schenk showed changes in density of adrenergic and cholinergic innervation during the oestrous cycle 44 and the NOS expression has been shown to be hormonally modulated. 45 ± 47 Given the difference between cycles of our control and DM rats one could speculate that the differences between the two groups are due to hormonal changes and not due to the diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%