Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.Publisher's statement: "© 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting /republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works."
A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP URL' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. Abstract-This paper presents a control strategy for a conventional Lundell alternator and an active-rectifier. The control scheme focuses on the minimisation of the stator copper losses of the alternator in an effort to maximise its efficiency. The modulation scheme of the active-rectifier is being investigated with the introduction of three different modulation techniques in order to quantify the effect they have on the alternator's efficiency. Steady-state results from experimental measurements of the alternator rectifier system are compared against a standard passive rectifier. The comparison indicates that the modulation scheme of the active-rectifier is significant to the alternator's efficiency as well as to the overall system efficiency.