2014
DOI: 10.14746/fpp.2014.19.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatyzacja w procesie detekcji obiektów archeologicznych z danych ALS

Abstract: ABSTRACT. In this paper approaches of historical, archaeological object detection from airborne laser scanning (hereinafter referred to as ASL) data were shown. Presented approach of automatic extraction of potential charcoal pile was the analysis of a selected processing of digital terrain model. In this example, it was attempted to detect archaeological sites on a small test area by usage of template matching. Positive results have proved a great number of detected objects. Methodology applied in the researc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interest in DCNNs (Deep Convolutional Neural Networks) for the recognition of archaeological structures is gradually increasing among the archaeological community. Research with ALS data using deep learning methods has involved spatially simple objects, e.g., burial mounds [1][2][3]20,21], charcoal piles [1,3,21,22], post-mining pits [23] as well as roundhouses and huts [2]; attempts to identify more spatially complex structures such as polygonal megalithic tombs [24] were also undertaken. Deep learning methods have also been implemented for the detection of multi-element objects with complex, irregular relief such as Celtic field systems [1,20].…”
Section: Deep Learning and Als Data In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interest in DCNNs (Deep Convolutional Neural Networks) for the recognition of archaeological structures is gradually increasing among the archaeological community. Research with ALS data using deep learning methods has involved spatially simple objects, e.g., burial mounds [1][2][3]20,21], charcoal piles [1,3,21,22], post-mining pits [23] as well as roundhouses and huts [2]; attempts to identify more spatially complex structures such as polygonal megalithic tombs [24] were also undertaken. Deep learning methods have also been implemented for the detection of multi-element objects with complex, irregular relief such as Celtic field systems [1,20].…”
Section: Deep Learning and Als Data In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional ALS data acquisition and processing is usually performed according to the following procedures: (1) acquisition of data, (2) classification of the point cloud, (3) generation of a DTM (Digital Terrain Model) followed by transformation into a visualisation (4). The preferred method of ALS data transformation to increase the visibility of the detected objects is LRM (Local Relief Model) [1][2][3]20,22,23]. This technique is used to extract small changes in terrain relief and is based on subtracting the mean values from the input DTM [26].…”
Section: Deep Learning and Als Data In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated by the studies of remnants of charcoal burning and tar distilling carried out using DEM, traces of charcoal piles are common finds in Polish forests [ 37 ]. This is confirmed by historical, cultural and environmental studies [ 22 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated methods could provide additional cognitive value. Methods such as machine learning or neural networks are already in use [80][81][82][83][84] and will be explored in the future. Since we have already verified the results in the field, we may have reference materials for automated solutions evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%