2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automating the visual resource management and harvest design process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the studies attempted to quantify visual impact by developing objective indices (e.g., Torres-Sibille et al, 2007;Rodrigues et al, 2010;, Chamberlain & Meitner, 2009;Domingo-Santos et al, 2011), while some others investigate human response to the visual effect of developments (e.g., Bishop and Miller, 2007;Cloquell-Ballester et al, 2012;Tempesta et al, 2014). Objective indices can be helpful in reflecting changes in the physical properties of the visual landscape, however, how viewers respond to the changes is also very important in measuring visual impact, as visual landscape quality is determined by the interaction of the physical properties of the landscape and the perception of human viewers (Daniel, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the studies attempted to quantify visual impact by developing objective indices (e.g., Torres-Sibille et al, 2007;Rodrigues et al, 2010;, Chamberlain & Meitner, 2009;Domingo-Santos et al, 2011), while some others investigate human response to the visual effect of developments (e.g., Bishop and Miller, 2007;Cloquell-Ballester et al, 2012;Tempesta et al, 2014). Objective indices can be helpful in reflecting changes in the physical properties of the visual landscape, however, how viewers respond to the changes is also very important in measuring visual impact, as visual landscape quality is determined by the interaction of the physical properties of the landscape and the perception of human viewers (Daniel, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will mean automating certain aspects of design and reserve placement (see Chamberlain and Meitner 2009) using various spatial and qualitative constraints which the planner directs. The intent for this system would be to help optimize the ratio of harvestable timber to visual impact, yet still be simple and intuitive enough for planners to use effectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used to evaluate alternative management strategies and to effectively communicate the impacts of those strategies to diverse stakeholder groups. In addition, 3-D visualization can depict the structure and composition of landscapes, and also portray spatial and temporal changes resulting from different natural disturbances or management strategies [5,15,18,42,43] The value of such 3-D landscape visualization depends on accuracy and realism, which will depend on the quality of the supporting data and the validity of the simulation models [22,48]. In order to produce 3-D visualization that can be viewed with confidence by various public groups, we must be assured of the accuracy of the underlying forest data and the application of this data to simulation models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%