2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automating Allocation of Development Assurance Levels: an extension to HiP-HOPS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The references listed here are mostly pertinent to safety critical civil aerospace development as to cover all topic domains within MBSE would require a more extensive review. However, even within the more restricted remit of safety critical aerospace systems and safety modelling there is a wide variety of approaches, with many based around particular languages (AltaRica [3], [5], [13], SCADE/Lustre [10]), or around a modelling environment such as Matlab Simulink [15] in combination with other tools, such as HiP-Hops [16] or physical simulation environments such as Modelica or Simscape ( [14], [15]. The decision to adopt SysML as the modelling language for UltraFan was taken prior to our work starting on ENCASE.…”
Section: Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The references listed here are mostly pertinent to safety critical civil aerospace development as to cover all topic domains within MBSE would require a more extensive review. However, even within the more restricted remit of safety critical aerospace systems and safety modelling there is a wide variety of approaches, with many based around particular languages (AltaRica [3], [5], [13], SCADE/Lustre [10]), or around a modelling environment such as Matlab Simulink [15] in combination with other tools, such as HiP-Hops [16] or physical simulation environments such as Modelica or Simscape ( [14], [15]. The decision to adopt SysML as the modelling language for UltraFan was taken prior to our work starting on ENCASE.…”
Section: Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… In (Sorokos et al, 2015), a Tabu search-based approach was applied to an aircraft wheel brake system, using DALs and the different decomposition logic set out in ARP4754-A. In this case every run of the algorithm produced an optimal solution, although the search space was considerably smaller.…”
Section: Fig 2 Iso 26262 V-model Development Process (Iso 2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is challenging for those approaches to perform well on a larger scale instance of the problem and to be flexible to the problem with variable cost function. Recognizing those difficulties, researchers have proposed methods using heuristics, such as TS and GA. Bieber and Sorokos studied the optimal DAL assignment for software; furthermore, Sorokos enabled a model-based approach by using the pure TS in conjunction with the reliability analysis tool HiP-HOPS to obtain the optimal requirement assignments (Bieber et al, 2011;Sorokos et al, 2015). Parker proposed a penalty-based GA to optimize the automotive safety integrity level allocation (Parker et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%