2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2014.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automaticity of the Hankel determinants of difference sequences of the Thue–Morse sequence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) The A m locates at [4], [5] followed by A m = B m , so they can't extend to a A m+1 = A m B m . This means, A m+1 occurs exactly twice in A m+1 A m+1 (resp.…”
Section: Prove Of Theorem 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) The A m locates at [4], [5] followed by A m = B m , so they can't extend to a A m+1 = A m B m . This means, A m+1 occurs exactly twice in A m+1 A m+1 (resp.…”
Section: Prove Of Theorem 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1998, Allouche-Peyrière-Wen-Wen [1] proved that all the Hankel determinants of the period-doubling sequence are odd integers. In 2014, Guo-Wen [5] determined the automaticity of the Hankel determinants of difference sequences of the Thue-Morse sequence, including D. In 2015, Parreau-Rigo-Rowland-Vandomme [11] proved that D have 2-abelian complexity sequences that are 2-regular. Fu-Han [4] considered t-extensions of the Hankel determinants of some certain automatic sequences, such as D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic sequence is studied by many authors both in formula language theory and number theory. It has many descriptions [3,8,9,11]. One of them is that its k-kernel is finite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prove that the irrationality exponent is invariant under direct product with a shift of the original Sturmian sequence. Recently, Guo and Wen proved in [16] that all the irrationality exponents of the differences are equal to 2. Recall that the difference of an binary sequence…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%