2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatically quantifying the scientific quality and sensationalism of news records mentioning pandemics: validating a maximum entropy machine-learning model

Abstract: Automated methods can evaluate news records faster, cheaper, and possibly better than humans. The specific procedure implemented in this study can at the very least identify subsets of news records that are far more likely to have particular scientific and discursive qualities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitative analysis of news media and political speeches can also be helpful. 21 There are additional insights to be gained from probing why other recent outbreaks, such as the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus, were not declared PHEICs. More research should also be conducted to better understand the role that scientific uncertainty may play in delaying political responses to outbreaks, as well as to better understand the additional factors beyond lagging political mobilization that contribute to delayed action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative analysis of news media and political speeches can also be helpful. 21 There are additional insights to be gained from probing why other recent outbreaks, such as the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus, were not declared PHEICs. More research should also be conducted to better understand the role that scientific uncertainty may play in delaying political responses to outbreaks, as well as to better understand the additional factors beyond lagging political mobilization that contribute to delayed action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These videos were rated by the PI and an independent rater on a number of variables, including production quality, believability, attire of presenters, lighting, primary topic, and the rater's opinion of the minimum education level needed to understand the message. The 10 video clips that were most closely matched on these variables were then rated by the PI and two colleagues with a slightly modified version of a questionnaire developed by Hoffman & Justicz (2016;Appendix B). This questionnaire allows for a sensationalism rating and a scientific rating to be calculated for each clip.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These videos were rated by the first author and an independent rater on several variables, such as production quality, believability, and primary topic. Ten video clips that were most closely matched on the attributes described above were then rated by the first author and two colleagues using a slightly modified version of a questionnaire developed by Hoffman and Justicz (2016). This questionnaire was used for quantifying the sensationalized and scientific qualities of each clip.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 Some of the lessons from these early works have been that information seeking behaviours wax and wane as new information becomes available and satisfies gaps in knowledge. 11–13 In some situation, especially in endemic settings, there may be an equilibrium between information seeking and case numbers, which is useful for predicting the pressure on frontline services or in countries with limited surveillance capability. 7 8 10 14 15 In this study, we look at information seeking behaviours among users of a UK national travel health website during the 2015–2016 ZIKV outbreak and compare this with time trends in concurrent internet searches and output from news media rooms.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%