69th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007 2007
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201401693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Well-to-Well Correlation Based on Consecutive Uncertainty Elimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the correlation of multi-wells, many divide-andconquer methods [11], [13], [14] are proposed in which the results of previous correlation are taken as constraints for next correlation. However, the correlation results of all well logs are sensitive to the order in which the wells are correlated due to the propagation of errors.…”
Section: A Correlation Models Of Wellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the correlation of multi-wells, many divide-andconquer methods [11], [13], [14] are proposed in which the results of previous correlation are taken as constraints for next correlation. However, the correlation results of all well logs are sensitive to the order in which the wells are correlated due to the propagation of errors.…”
Section: A Correlation Models Of Wellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method developed by Le Nir et al (1998) uses the most geologically complete well as a key well to which all other well logs are aligned. Alternatively, Fang and Chen (1992) and Kovalevskiy et al (2007) propose divide-and-conquer methods for correlating multiple well logs. In these methods, correlations are first performed for the three pairs that can be formed from only three logs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%