2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(02)00188-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic vs hand-controlled walking of paraplegics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…FES systems are often used in motor neural prostheses (e.g., the peroneal stimulator for stroke patients (Burridge et al, 2007;Everaert et al, 2013) and may be designed as surface or implantable stimulation systems for control of the arm and hand (Hart et al, 1988;Popović et al, 2004) or for control of standing and walking (Kralj and Bajd, 1989;Nataraj et al, 2012;Dutta et al, 2011;Popović et al, 2003)). FES devices directly assist in the performance of disrupted functions in humans with CNS lesions; furthermore, FES causes changes in cortical excitability and stimulates cortical reorganization (carry-over effects).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FES systems are often used in motor neural prostheses (e.g., the peroneal stimulator for stroke patients (Burridge et al, 2007;Everaert et al, 2013) and may be designed as surface or implantable stimulation systems for control of the arm and hand (Hart et al, 1988;Popović et al, 2004) or for control of standing and walking (Kralj and Bajd, 1989;Nataraj et al, 2012;Dutta et al, 2011;Popović et al, 2003)). FES devices directly assist in the performance of disrupted functions in humans with CNS lesions; furthermore, FES causes changes in cortical excitability and stimulates cortical reorganization (carry-over effects).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between PCI and VO2 has been studied in healthy adults [10]. The retest reliability of PCI has been investigated in healthy subjects [10]- [13]children with cerebral palsy [15]and adults with spinal cord [13]and brain injuries [16].PCI has been used as an outcome measure after interventions in persons with cerebral palsy [17],spinal cord injury [18], [19]and stroke [21], [22].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). This is in contrast with usual kinematic-based finite-state controllers (e.g., using functional electrical stimulation [6,7] or intraspinal stimulation [8]), where triggering times are most often determined from local readings of specific joint angles or positions. In such cases, the high selectivity of electrodes is such that single variables (or a combination of a small number of them) provide enough information to determine when specific sites ought to be active.…”
Section: Triggering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%