The Fourth International Workshop on Advanced Computational Intelligence 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iwaci.2011.6160012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic verification of event-driven control programs: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Поскольку код предполагается генерировать по исходному представлению графа, сначала выполняется топологическая сортировка графа. Применимость метода продемонстрирована на одном примере [22].…”
Section: обзор связанных работunclassified
“…Поскольку код предполагается генерировать по исходному представлению графа, сначала выполняется топологическая сортировка графа. Применимость метода продемонстрирована на одном примере [22].…”
Section: обзор связанных работunclassified
“…Five case studies have been conducted using M 3 C. Three cases are from actual industrial systems: the multifunction vehicle bus (MVB) and the wire train bus (WTB) systems (a) Automaton module (b) PLC function Figure 1: Model of the double-door controller used in high-speed rail [3], and the traverse control system in a steel plate manufacturing line [2]. The other cases (the double-door controller and the bottling machine) originate from the literature.…”
Section: Tool and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the model does not satisfy the specification, a model checker will give a counterexample execution of the model which demonstrates how the specification is violated. A modeling and verification method for modeling external environments and temporal features is proposed in [15] for PLC (Programmable Logic Controller [16]) system. The idea is also suitable for MVB, but the method cannot be applied in MVB due to the differences between the PLC and MVB.…”
Section: Synchronous and Asynchronous Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%