SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2001 2001
DOI: 10.1190/1.1816780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the presence of kinematic artifacts will complicate migration velocity analysis in complex structure. The complication could easily be fatal for automated velocity analysis algorithms, such as differential semblance optimization (Gockenbach and Symes, 1999;Mulder and ten Kroode, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the presence of kinematic artifacts will complicate migration velocity analysis in complex structure. The complication could easily be fatal for automated velocity analysis algorithms, such as differential semblance optimization (Gockenbach and Symes, 1999;Mulder and ten Kroode, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An abundance of numerical evidence exists that this holds for laterally varying models (Chauris & Noble, 2001;Mulder & ten Kroode, 2002;Li & Symes, 2007). An alternative to differentiating w.r.t.…”
Section: Dsomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When this is not the case, a preprocessing step is necessary to attenuate the events or the attenuation must be incorporated into the objective function (Mulder and ten Kroode, 2002). These authors show how multiples can strongly bias the velocity updates.…”
Section: Pre-stack-exploding-reflector Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%