2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2010.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic urban building boundary extraction from high resolution aerial images using an innovative model of active contours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Afterwards, Theng [13] fully automates the system by adding an automatic corner detector that initializes the active contour model. Ahmady et al [14] and Ge et al [15] initialize the contours using regularly distributed circumferences that progressively merge after some repetition. Ok [16] applies the active contours technique specifically to simplify and merge the detected edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, Theng [13] fully automates the system by adding an automatic corner detector that initializes the active contour model. Ahmady et al [14] and Ge et al [15] initialize the contours using regularly distributed circumferences that progressively merge after some repetition. Ok [16] applies the active contours technique specifically to simplify and merge the detected edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, experts have developed several automatic and semiautomatic procedures to rapidly delineate roof outlines of buildings from high-resolution optical remote sensing images either with a particular purpose of characterizing earthquake risks (Table 1) or with a wider aim (e.g., Ahmadi et al 2010;Ghaffarian and Ghaffarian 2014;Gianinetto 2008;Ouzounis et al 2012;Shorter and Kasparis 2009). However, it remains difficult to apply these technically advanced procedures to irregularly shaped buildings and to identify and eliminate shading, interference, and high gray-tone similarity effects.…”
Section: Estimating Building Footprint Areas From Ge Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, existing active contour models based on implementation method are classified into two main categories: parametric and geometric models. Parametric snakes are represented explicitly as parameterized contours, and the snake evolution is only performed on a predetermined spline control points (Ahmadi et al, 2010). Geometric models are represented implicitly as the zero-level sets of higher dimensional surfaces, and the updating is performed on the surface function within the entire image domain (Liu and Prinet, 2005).…”
Section: Active Contour Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important advantage of the proposed model is the less sensitivity to noisy images. Various works in related to this field have executed (Ahmadi et al, 2010;Lie et al, 2006). As mentioned in previous section, edge-based geometric active contour is similar to region-based with difference that the edgebased methods utilize gradient information derived from image to move the contour towards object boundaries.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%