Adaptive Systems in Control and Signal Processing 1992 1993
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-041717-2.50065-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Tuning and Adaptation for Pid Controllers - A Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
121
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
121
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…All Foxboro's controllers studied here are rule-based, instead of model-based but do not support feedforward control. If they support gain scheduling, however, they will be very effective for the entire operating envelope, as gain-scheduling can be more useful than continuous adaptation in most situations [3].…”
Section: Foxboro Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All Foxboro's controllers studied here are rule-based, instead of model-based but do not support feedforward control. If they support gain scheduling, however, they will be very effective for the entire operating envelope, as gain-scheduling can be more useful than continuous adaptation in most situations [3].…”
Section: Foxboro Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most modern PID controllers are implemented in digital processors, they can accommodate more mathematical functions and modifications to the standard three terms shown in (1) to (3). A simple and most widely adopted anti-windup scheme can be realized in software or firmware by modifying the integral action to (7) where represents the saturated control action and is a correcting factor.…”
Section: Integrator Windup and Remediesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, an estimation θ m of the apparent dead time of the system can be performed by considering the time interval from the application of the step signal to the set-point and the time instant when the process output attains 2% of the new set-point value A s , namely, when the condition y > 0.02A s occurs. In this context, in order to cope with the measurement noise, a simple sensible solution is to define a noise band NB [19] (whose amplitude should be equal to the amplitude of the measurement noise) and to rewrite the condition as y > NB . Then, Expression (13) can be rewritten as:…”
Section: Set-point Following Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral gain was then selected to satisfy any steady state error requirements. The transient response was finally restored by selecting a suitable derivative gain 16,17 .…”
Section: Arduino Microcontroller Servo Motormentioning
confidence: 99%