2000
DOI: 10.1243/0954405001517676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic tool selection for milling operations Part 2: Tool sorting and variety reduction

Abstract: The ®rst part of this paper introduced a procedure for rapidly calculating optimized cutting data for all the feasible tools for a given milling operation. Having produced this list of tools with associated optimized cutting conditions, the preferred tool is selected by sorting the list by a composite objective function incorporating a combination of four desirable conditions: maximum metal removal rate, maximum tool life, minimum overall cost and minimum overall cutting time. These four criteria are normalize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the correct holders 28 and inserts have been selected to work in each area, many changes of cutting tools are probably required. The number of changes can be reduced by ordering the changes with the next procedure…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the correct holders 28 and inserts have been selected to work in each area, many changes of cutting tools are probably required. The number of changes can be reduced by ordering the changes with the next procedure…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All pixels contained in the part are labeled in coordinates (i, k) and a logical value (0); all pixels of the structural element of the tool with another logical value are labeled (1), when a structural element with the shape of the cutting tool is displaced through all the image and if the position of one or more pixels of the structural element belong to the part then an intersection exists. After the correct holders 22 and inserts have been selected to work on each area, many changes of cutting tools will probably be required. The number of changes can be reduced by ordering the changes with the next procedure…”
Section: Step 4 Part Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carpenter and Maropoulos [20] detailed work on rationalization issues to enhance tool selection, and [32], etc. In order to compensate for the eVect of cutting tools, toolholders and tool overhang on recommended machinability data (in particular cutting speed), fuzzy logic was utilized.…”
Section: Both Roughing and ®Nishing Face Mill Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints considered were the dimensional tolerance of geometric features, workpiece surface roughness, workpiece material and machine tool characteristics. Carpenter and Maropoulos [19,20] developed the 'OPTIMUM' system for a range of rough and ®nish milling operations. Their research involved machinability data optimization under a range of technological constraints, which included tool life, workpiece surface roughness, machine power and available spindle speeds and feed rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%