2009
DOI: 10.1049/el.2009.0176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic tool for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis using PCA and Bayesian classification rules

Abstract: An automatic tool to assist the interpretation of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) images for the diagnosis of the Alzheimer's disease (AD) is demonstrated. The main problem to be handled is the so-called small size sample, which consists of having a small number of available images compared to the large number of features. This problem is faced by intensively reducing the dimension of the feature space by means of principal component analysis (PCA). Our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. 35, a CAD system for an automatic evaluation of the neuroimages is presented. In that work, principal component analysis ͑PCA͒ based methods are proposed as feature extraction techniques, enhanced by other linear approaches such as linear discriminant analysis or the measure of the Fisher discriminant ratio for feature selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 35, a CAD system for an automatic evaluation of the neuroimages is presented. In that work, principal component analysis ͑PCA͒ based methods are proposed as feature extraction techniques, enhanced by other linear approaches such as linear discriminant analysis or the measure of the Fisher discriminant ratio for feature selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dehghan [83] improved these results combining both FDG and PiB PET scans, and using PCA and SVM algorithms for feature extraction and classification, they achieved 94.12% of accuracy distinguishing AD from healthy controls and 82.05% in the case of MCI and controls. A group of investigators of the University of Granada has published several important works proposing automatic PET based AD diagnosis tools [84][85][86], reporting high accuracies of up to 98.3% distinguishing AD patients and healthy controls, 77.47% separating CTLs from both AD and MCI patients and 68.79% in classifying MCI patients and controls.…”
Section: Pet Scansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAD systems have been developed using SPECT images and machine-learning techniques [84,86,94,97,98]. Lopez et al [84] have been able to distinguish AD patients of Alzheimer's Disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) database [99] from CTLs with 96.7% accuracy, using PCA based features of preselected slices of interest and an SVM classifier with a quadratic kernel.…”
Section: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (Spect)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive and negative likelihoods (PL/NL) are also displayed as a measure of the positive and negative predictive value of the method, given its prevalence independence. Results using PCA and ICA are compared to VAF [68,67] and PCA-f [35,42,43], selecting the best performance scenarios for kernel SVM and knn classifiers. 1 The training process is showed in detail in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%