2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icpr56361.2022.9956708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic teeth segmentation on panoramic X-rays using deep neural networks

Abstract: In order to build an intelligent dental care process that both facilitates the treatment and improves the diagnosis, an accurate tooth segmentation and recognition on panoramic X-ray images might prove helpful. Although many studies have been conducted on teeth segmentation, few methods allow to perform tooth recognition and numbering at the same time. The existing methods allowing both those processes rely on instance segmentation architectures. To fill some gaps in the area of dental image segmentation, we p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is the highest accuracy reported in studies. Among the studies that used U-Net, study of Nader et al with 543 samples has a Dice value of 90%, and in the study of Koch et al with 1500 samples, the Dice value is reported as 93.6% [12,14]. According to the network settings and its hyperparameters, in our proposed method, even though the number of samples is 527, the Dice value is 95.3%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value is the highest accuracy reported in studies. Among the studies that used U-Net, study of Nader et al with 543 samples has a Dice value of 90%, and in the study of Koch et al with 1500 samples, the Dice value is reported as 93.6% [12,14]. According to the network settings and its hyperparameters, in our proposed method, even though the number of samples is 527, the Dice value is 95.3%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The accuracy of the identification has reached 99.7%. In Nader et al's study, tooth segmentation was investigated on the panoramic radiographic images by using the U-Net network [14]. The results of that study have been reported to be about 90% according to Dice.…”
Section: анализ и нумерация зубов на ортопантомограммах с использован...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section presents a comprehensive analysis and discussion of the performance of the proposed model for dental segmentation. We compared our segmentation model to several well-established segmentation models, including the traditional U-Net [20], Attention U-Net [12], ResNet-50 Attention U-Net [39], Swin U-Net [40], and a Modified U-Net [10], which is identical to BB-Unet [11].The performance of the proposed model was evaluated using multiple critical metrics, including ACC, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), JI, precision, recall, and specificity. It is noted that we aim to segment each tooth in an X-ray image into 32 categories based on the World Dental Federation (FDI) notation [42], where each tooth is categorized into #11 to #18, #21 to #28, #31 to #38 and #41 to #48.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed method required approximately 60 minutes for training to achieve the segmentation performance in Table II. Other methods achieve DSC values of 0.7602, 0.7846, 0.7875, 0.6348, and 0.9004 and run-times of 45, 48-, 48-, 68-, and 64-minutes training times for [20], [12], [39], [40] and [10], respectively. These values are obtained from the above-mentioned experimental setup.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation