Automatic Target Recognition XX; Acquisition, Tracking, Pointing, and Laser Systems Technologies XXIV; And Optical Pattern Reco 2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.849591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic target recognition via sparse representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for vehicle recognition, rotation invariance is important and many more vehicle images taken from different angles are crucial. 14 Those are often similar. In such scenarios, there will be more similar SIFT descriptors.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, for vehicle recognition, rotation invariance is important and many more vehicle images taken from different angles are crucial. 14 Those are often similar. In such scenarios, there will be more similar SIFT descriptors.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Principles of Compressed Sensing theory developed by Candes, Romberg and Tao, [4], [5], have been demonstrated to be robust when applied to recognition systems. Wright in [6], formulated the recognition problem as an undetermined system of equations y = Ax , with A containing vectorized image samples from all classes and the solution vector x containing the identity of the test input y. Estabridis, [7], expanded on their work and applied it to target recognition in clutter at ranges of 1, 2 and 3 Kilometers for both EO and IR modalities. Neither work included spatial information during the discrimination process, but both approaches demonstrated good performance within the sparse representation framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither work included spatial information during the discrimination process, but both approaches demonstrated good performance within the sparse representation framework. Previous work on object identification for faces and ground vehicles based on CS theory ( [6], [8], and [7]), showed the robustness of exploiting sparsity to solve the recognition problem. However, the tested scenarios assume that there is sufficient training data to create robust target representations that extrapolate to future test input data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One classification algorithm which has received much attention for its success in face recognition is that proposed by Wright et al [1] using methods from the theory of sparse matrix representation and compressive sensing. This method has also been applied successfully to automatic target recognition, specifically to ground vehicles [2]. The sparse representation based classification (SRC) algorithm from [1] relies on representing an image to be classified as a linear combination of elements from an overcomplete dictionary of training images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%