2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic summarising: The state of the art

Abstract: This paper reviews research on automatic summarising in the last decade. This work has grown, stimulated by technology and by evaluation programmes. The paper uses several frameworks to organise the review, for summarising itself, for the factors affecting summarising, for systems, and for evaluation.The review examines the evaluation strategies applied to summarising, the issues they raise, and the major programmes. It considers the input, purpose and output factors investigated in recent summarising research… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Different studies suggest that, when humans had to decide the most relevant sentences from documents in order to produce summaries, they frequently disagree in which sentences best represent the content of a document (Spärck Jones, 2007;McKeown et al, 2001). However, although the low agreement between humans is a problem, new evaluation methods and tools (such as the Pyramid scheme previously described) appear to offer a way to reduce disagreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies suggest that, when humans had to decide the most relevant sentences from documents in order to produce summaries, they frequently disagree in which sentences best represent the content of a document (Spärck Jones, 2007;McKeown et al, 2001). However, although the low agreement between humans is a problem, new evaluation methods and tools (such as the Pyramid scheme previously described) appear to offer a way to reduce disagreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the large variety of textual input that is undergoing summarization, and the different requirements the summaries are to fulfil, there is a large number of approaches to summarization evaluation (Spärck Jones 2007;Mani 2001;Nenkova and McKeown 2011;Jurafsky and Martin 2009). Automatic Summarization, along with its evaluation, has come a long way since its first applications in the 1950s, but it is still a growing field.…”
Section: Summary and Outlook With Some Short Remarks On Summarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review research in automatic summarizing in the last decade is presented in [4] which concludes that automatic summarization techniques has made steady progress, with better evaluation and better tools & applications, but their research stated the poor motivation of summarizing systems in relation to the factors affecting them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%