2020
DOI: 10.1515/cdbme-2020-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic stent and catheter marker detection in X-ray fluoroscopy using adaptive thresholding and classification

Abstract: In this study, we propose a method for marker detection in X-ray fluoroscopy sequences based on adaptive thresholding and classification. Adaptive thresholding yields multiple marker candidates. To remove non-marker areas, 24 specific features are extracted from each extracted patch and four supervised classifiers are trained to differentiate non-marker areas from marker areas. Quantitative evaluation was carried out to assess different classifier performance by calculating accuracy, sensitivity, specificity a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, for opaque markers that are not necessarily pairwise like in our study, other techniques have to be designed. Accordingly, in our previous study [ 8 ], we proposed a general approach to detect stent and catheter markers. The main differences between our previous and our current approach, are as follows: different pre-processing techniques were used, in the previous technique, adaptive thresholding was used to detect probable marker areas and its performance highly depends on its sensitivity value, which finally negatively affected the generalizability of the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, for opaque markers that are not necessarily pairwise like in our study, other techniques have to be designed. Accordingly, in our previous study [ 8 ], we proposed a general approach to detect stent and catheter markers. The main differences between our previous and our current approach, are as follows: different pre-processing techniques were used, in the previous technique, adaptive thresholding was used to detect probable marker areas and its performance highly depends on its sensitivity value, which finally negatively affected the generalizability of the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the blob-like structure of the markers, blob analysis was used to generate features. Difference of Gaussian (DoG), Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG), and two types of the Determinant of Hessian (DoH) were computed for all the extracted patches [ 8 ]. The Hessian matrix for the first type of DoH is the directional gradient of the input, while the Hessian matrix for the second type of DoH is the second derivative of the Gaussian of the input.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al [15] used probabilistic boosting trees combining joint local context of each marker pair as classifiers to detect markers. Chabi et al [6] detected potential markers based on adaptive threshold and refined detections by excluding non-mask area using various machine learning classifiers, including k-nearest neighbor, naive Bayesian classifier, support vector machine and linear discriminant analysis. Vernikouskaya et al [23] employed U-Net, a popular encoder-decoder like CNN designed specifically for medical images, to segment markers and catheter shafts during pulmonary vein isolation as binary masks.…”
Section: Balloon Marker Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%