2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Short Answer Grading via Multiway Attention Networks

Abstract: Automatic short answer grading (ASAG), which autonomously score student answers according to reference answers, provides a costeffective and consistent approach to teaching professionals and can reduce their monotonous and tedious grading workloads. However, ASAG is a very challenging task due to two reasons: (1) student answers are made up of free text which requires a deep semantic understanding; and (2) the questions are usually open-ended and across many domains in K-12 scenarios. In this paper, we propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such features have been further explored in Magooda et al (2016) to include a number of corpusbased, knowledge-based, word-based, and vector-based similarity indices. Recently, few studies have been presented using transformer-based architectures (Devlin et al 2019) and neural network classifiers to perform short-answer grading (Liu et al 2019;. Although neural approaches have demonstrated acceptable performance and generalisation capabilities across domains ) and languages (Camus and Filighera 2020), they typically require large amounts of data to learn an accurate classification model, as confirmed in the studies cited above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such features have been further explored in Magooda et al (2016) to include a number of corpusbased, knowledge-based, word-based, and vector-based similarity indices. Recently, few studies have been presented using transformer-based architectures (Devlin et al 2019) and neural network classifiers to perform short-answer grading (Liu et al 2019;. Although neural approaches have demonstrated acceptable performance and generalisation capabilities across domains ) and languages (Camus and Filighera 2020), they typically require large amounts of data to learn an accurate classification model, as confirmed in the studies cited above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We tested these models because they have achieved state-of-the-art performance in natural language inference tasks (Zhang et al 2018), which inspired the choice to concatenate the students' answers and correct answers in the proposed approach. They were also successfully applied to short-answer grading on English data, with larger datasets than ours (Liu et al 2019;. In our experiments, we adopted the Base Multilingual Cased model, 2 covering 104 languages with 12 layers, 768 dimensional states, 12 heads, and 110M parameters.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Answer Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author in [28] proposed a multi-way attention architecture for AES task. The proposed architecture contains a transformer layer at first which process pre-trained Glove word embedding of student's answer and model's answer.…”
Section: A Supervised Aesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NLP-based research works generally use semantic matching techniques for comparison of student answer with reference answer(s) for short answer grading. These works are found mostly effective for close-ended short answer questions [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Related Work -Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence deep semantic understanding is required for a good ASAG system. The paper [15] proposes an ASAG framework for grading open-ended answers by modelling semantic relations between student answers and reference answers. The framework comprises of four layers.…”
Section: Related Work -Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%