2018
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2018.2849499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Segmentation of Tree Structure From Point Cloud Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerous approaches for plant segmentation include the combination of colour information and 3D models [ADT11, MBW*18], adapted surface feature‐based techniques [PDMK13], model‐based approaches based on cylinder representations of stems and separate segmentation tailored to leaves [GDHB17], skeleton‐based stem and leaf point recognition approaches 2019, facet region growing approaches after an initial oversegmentation [LCT*18] as well as automated, data‐driven approaches for plant structure segmentation based on geometric features and Random Forests classifiers (e.g. [DNC*18]) or geometric features and clustering 2015.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerous approaches for plant segmentation include the combination of colour information and 3D models [ADT11, MBW*18], adapted surface feature‐based techniques [PDMK13], model‐based approaches based on cylinder representations of stems and separate segmentation tailored to leaves [GDHB17], skeleton‐based stem and leaf point recognition approaches 2019, facet region growing approaches after an initial oversegmentation [LCT*18] as well as automated, data‐driven approaches for plant structure segmentation based on geometric features and Random Forests classifiers (e.g. [DNC*18]) or geometric features and clustering 2015.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include four broadleaved and two coniferous tree models with different structural features of woody organs (Figure 2). After removing the foliage parts in each tree model, we converted the woody parts into point cloud data (Digumarti, Nieto et al 2018). To reduce the computation cost during the skeleton extraction, each resampled point cloud data has 250, 000 points.…”
Section: The Validation Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the noise and missing parts inevitably exist in the in-situ collected data, we randomly added the Gaussian noise and outliers to the point cloud converted from the simulated tree models (Digumarti, Nieto et al 2018). Moreover, we randomly removed parts of point cloud data (Mei, Zhang et al 2016).…”
Section: The Validation Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of this paper, we are focused on separating parts of a forest into terrain, vegetation, coarse woody debris, and stem categories from a point cloud. There have been many different approaches to the segmentation of forest point clouds [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] so far. Some approaches use heuristics [20,22,25,28,29] or morphological operations [27], while others use supervised [23,26,[30][31][32][33] or unsupervised [21,34] machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%