2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Segmentation of the Prostate on CT Images Using Deep Neural Networks (DNN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
78
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17 The HD was 7.0 AE 3.5 mm, 7.3 AE 2.0 mm, and 6.3 AE 2.0 mm for three groups. 17 Our results showed that the mean DSC and HD of 44 3D TRUS images were 0.92 AE 0.09 and 4.38 AE 4.66 mm, respectively. Although the mean metrics of our method is better than their results, the standard deviation of our method is larger than what Liu et al reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…17 The HD was 7.0 AE 3.5 mm, 7.3 AE 2.0 mm, and 6.3 AE 2.0 mm for three groups. 17 Our results showed that the mean DSC and HD of 44 3D TRUS images were 0.92 AE 0.09 and 4.38 AE 4.66 mm, respectively. Although the mean metrics of our method is better than their results, the standard deviation of our method is larger than what Liu et al reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Supervised machine learning has demonstrated enormous potential in medical image segmentation. According to the training model used, these methods can be grouped into support vector machines (SVM)‐based, random forest (RF)‐based, and deep learning‐based methods . The SVM‐based and RF‐based methods use handcraft information, such as texture features, to train a SVM or RF classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Intensive studies have been made regarding prostate CT automatic segmentation. Recently, the reported highest DSC is 0.88 ± 0.03 by Liu et al [12]using U-Net and 1114 ture CT cases. Our average result is 0.73±0.09 which is compatibe with Burgos et al [13] using multi-atlas based SynCT (0.73 DSC).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 94%