2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic segmentation of the pharyngeal airway space with convolutional neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, lack of data heterogeneity remains a limitation, and there is a need to incorporate data from other CBCT devices with varying scanning parameters to justify the generalizability of the tool. In the near future, we plan to integrate other validated individual anatomical regions, such as the mandible, inferior alveolar canal, and pharyngeal airway [ 9 11 ]. It is also expected to expand the tool’s ability by integrating data from intra-oral scanners and facial scanners for the creation of a complete virtual patient, which could enhance the delivery of personalized dental care [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, lack of data heterogeneity remains a limitation, and there is a need to incorporate data from other CBCT devices with varying scanning parameters to justify the generalizability of the tool. In the near future, we plan to integrate other validated individual anatomical regions, such as the mandible, inferior alveolar canal, and pharyngeal airway [ 9 11 ]. It is also expected to expand the tool’s ability by integrating data from intra-oral scanners and facial scanners for the creation of a complete virtual patient, which could enhance the delivery of personalized dental care [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was calculated based on previous comparable studies using a priori power analysis in G* power 3.1, with a power of 80% and a significance level of 5%[ 9 , 11 ]. In this way, a total dataset of 40 scans of two devices (20 Accuitomo 3D ; 20 Newtom VGi evo ) was selected, consisting of 560 teeth, 80 sinuses, and 40 maxillofacial complexes acquired with different scanning parameters (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ICC values were reported as 0.899 by Zhang et al 45 , 0.977 by Leonardi et al 46 , 0.985 by Sin et al 12 , 0.986 by Park et al 47 . Shujaat et al 48 provided precision, recall, accuracy, dice, intersection over union values in their study as 0.97 ± 0.01, 0.96 ± 0.03 1.00 ± 0.00 0.97 ± 0.02 and 0.93 ± 0.03, respectively. In our study, the ICC value between the ground truth and DC was 0.972 which indicates that an excellent reliability was present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it only focused on the oropharynx but not on the nasopharynx. Some research reported automatic segmentation of the airway space with convolutional neural network on CBCT images [ 34 , 35 ]. We must admit that CBCT offers information on cross-sectional areas, volume, and 3D form that cannot be determined by cephalometric images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%