2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83955-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic segmentation of inner ear on CT-scan using auto-context convolutional neural network

Abstract: Temporal bone CT-scan is a prerequisite in most surgical procedures concerning the ear such as cochlear implants. The 3D vision of inner ear structures is crucial for diagnostic and surgical preplanning purposes. Since clinical CT-scans are acquired at relatively low resolutions, improved performance can be achieved by registering patient-specific CT images to a high-resolution inner ear model built from accurate 3D segmentations based on micro-CT of human temporal bone specimens. This paper presents a framewo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative comparison of performances is not straightforward due to differences in image modality (CT, µCT or ultra high resolution CT), in metrics (Dice, precision, mean surface error), in subject population (cadaveric vs patient) but also in the target anatomical structures (cochlea vs cochlea labyrinth). In most cases, cochlea segmentation from µCT images are used as ground truth information and a direct comparison between our work with (Raabid et al, 2021) is possible since they used a subset of dataset #3 which is a public database (Wimmer et al, 2019). We see that our unsupervised approach performs as well as the supervised methods with Dice scores in the range [0.85, 0.91] and outperforms previous unsupervised methods.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Quantitative comparison of performances is not straightforward due to differences in image modality (CT, µCT or ultra high resolution CT), in metrics (Dice, precision, mean surface error), in subject population (cadaveric vs patient) but also in the target anatomical structures (cochlea vs cochlea labyrinth). In most cases, cochlea segmentation from µCT images are used as ground truth information and a direct comparison between our work with (Raabid et al, 2021) is possible since they used a subset of dataset #3 which is a public database (Wimmer et al, 2019). We see that our unsupervised approach performs as well as the supervised methods with Dice scores in the range [0.85, 0.91] and outperforms previous unsupervised methods.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The former approaches are mostly based on cochlear shape fitting based on template image registration (Baker and Barnes, 2005), parametric shape model (Baker, 2008). The supervised methods are based on statistical deformation models (Ruiz Pujadas et al, 2018) and deep learning (Lv et al, 2021;Raabid et al, 2021;Heutink et al, 2020).…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is architecture is formed from two significant parts: convolutional and deconvolutional networks [24]. Deconvolutional networks are CNNs that operate during a reversed process, and networks extract discriminated features.…”
Section: Convolutional and Deconvolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the automatic extraction process on the micro part of the Temporal bone structure from the CT-scan image with the Morphological Enhancement and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) methods produces an accurate detection of the Temporal bone structure [18]. In another study, it was explained that the segmentation and extraction process using the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method combined with the Region Extraction method gave limited results in the middle ear and did not focus on the MACS [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%