2023
DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00554-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic rigid image Fusion of preoperative MR and intraoperative US acquired after craniotomy

Abstract: Background Neuronavigation of preoperative MRI is limited by several errors. Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) with navigated probes that provide automatic superposition of pre-operative MRI and iUS and three-dimensional iUS reconstruction may overcome some of these limitations. Aim of the present study is to verify the accuracy of an automatic MRI – iUS fusion algorithm to improve MR-based neuronavigation accuracy. Methods An algorithm using Linear … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach implemented rigid co-registration for CT and iUS data [ 27 ] and was later adapted to MRI and iUS data implementing the Linear Correlation of Linear Combination (LC2) similarity metric, allowing for rigid image co-registration over a couple of seconds [ 28 ], which has been successfully technically evaluated within the CuRIOUS2018 Challenge [ 69 ]. Based on this approach, rigid image-based MRI-iUS co-registration has been implemented (Brainlab, Munich, Germany), and a prior release has been applied in a retrospective case series including patients with intracranial lesions in a comparable setup as that used in this study [ 70 ] and released as a fully integrated part of the navigational system, easing the intraoperative workflow and usage. The results of the CuRIOUS2018 Challenge and the prerelease evaluation of a prototype showed a significant decrease in the navigation inaccuracy by iUS-based navigation updates relying on rigid image-based co-registration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another approach implemented rigid co-registration for CT and iUS data [ 27 ] and was later adapted to MRI and iUS data implementing the Linear Correlation of Linear Combination (LC2) similarity metric, allowing for rigid image co-registration over a couple of seconds [ 28 ], which has been successfully technically evaluated within the CuRIOUS2018 Challenge [ 69 ]. Based on this approach, rigid image-based MRI-iUS co-registration has been implemented (Brainlab, Munich, Germany), and a prior release has been applied in a retrospective case series including patients with intracranial lesions in a comparable setup as that used in this study [ 70 ] and released as a fully integrated part of the navigational system, easing the intraoperative workflow and usage. The results of the CuRIOUS2018 Challenge and the prerelease evaluation of a prototype showed a significant decrease in the navigation inaccuracy by iUS-based navigation updates relying on rigid image-based co-registration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the spatial overlap of lesions seen in the MRI and iUS data, the quality of co-registration was also assessed in a landmark-based manner, comparing the distances between the corresponding landmarks in both modalities, as previously performed in a recent pilot study with supratentorial lesions [ 70 ]. In this study on infratentorial lesions surgically treated in the sitting position, initial reference array-based registration led to a mean Euclidean distance of 8.69 ± 6.23 mm (ranging from 2.85 mm to 37.2 mm), which was also significantly improved by rigid image-based co-registration with a mean Euclidean distance of 3.19 ± 2.73 mm (ranging from 1.77 mm to 6.40 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%