2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2005.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic registration of portal images and volumetric CT for patient positioning in radiation therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clippe et al [6] and Kim et al [7] test the registration method on phantoms, but introducing markers inside the phantom to help the registration. Künzler's method [8] requires only a simple equalization of the portal image to register it, while Khamene et al [9] work with portal images without accelerator print.…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clippe et al [6] and Kim et al [7] test the registration method on phantoms, but introducing markers inside the phantom to help the registration. Künzler's method [8] requires only a simple equalization of the portal image to register it, while Khamene et al [9] work with portal images without accelerator print.…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ray casting is the most popular algorithm for volume rendering in general and DRR generation in particular [26,29,33]. One widespread used implementation of ray casting for the GPU is to utilize a bounding structure -a simple geometric body that encloses the voxel volume -to generate rays that are used to traverse and sample a volume in form of a texture.…”
Section: Ray Castingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D/3D registration [23][24][25][26][27][28][29], the derivation of six degrees of rigid body motion from an iterative comparison of perspective volume renderings simulating x-ray images (also called digitally rendered radiographs or DRRs) and real x-ray data taken during irradiation might provide a non-invasive method to track tumor motion. However, the massive computational effort connected to DRR rendering does still result in typical runtimes of 30 to 100 seconds until the registration process is completed [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One particular example is local cross-correlation, where brightness and contrast may vary, since they are implicitly computed, within the neighborhood of every image pixel [4]. It is also possible to implicitly recover unknown parameters of a linear combination of two image components within a similarity formulation [7].…”
Section: Projection Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%