2008
DOI: 10.14358/pers.74.2.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Registration and Mosaicking for Airborne Multispectral Image Sequences

Abstract: Airborne remote sensing has important applications in agriculture monitoring because of the flexibility of system deployment. The major obstacle in practical use is its high cost. To reduce the cost, a multispectral system can be assembled by using individual cameras onboard a small aerial platform, such as a miniature unmanned aerial vehicle (mini-UAV). In such a case, the cameras may have shifting and rotational misalignment, even after careful adjustment. Contiguous frames are captured as the platform flies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the preliminary experiments of our coastal shoreline UAS images have shown that Autopano Pro [31], one of the widely used commercial versions of the SIFT algorithm, could produce inappropriate tie points for some neighboring images due to no distinctive features being present. Feature-based image registration algorithms also failed in some rangeland and agricultural areas [32,33]. Our experiments showed that the area-based image similarity could find correct locations at some failure cases by the SIFT algorithm.…”
Section: Co-registrationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, the preliminary experiments of our coastal shoreline UAS images have shown that Autopano Pro [31], one of the widely used commercial versions of the SIFT algorithm, could produce inappropriate tie points for some neighboring images due to no distinctive features being present. Feature-based image registration algorithms also failed in some rangeland and agricultural areas [32,33]. Our experiments showed that the area-based image similarity could find correct locations at some failure cases by the SIFT algorithm.…”
Section: Co-registrationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…An efficient workflow is necessary for the entire processing chain so that end products of a given accuracy can be obtained in a reasonable time. The position and attitude data acquired from UAS often suffer from lower accuracy compared to data acquired with piloted aircraft, and various custom approaches have been developed for orthorectification and mosaicking of UAS imagery [28][29][30][31]. Radiometric correction can also be challenging due to the (potentially) large number of individual images, image quality, and limits over the control of image acquisition parameters [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this research was based on a camera that was modified from a consumer-level RGB camera that had only three bands, and choosing an optimal band to conduct feature matching was not discussed. Du [29] directly used the NIR band for feature matching, and the variation of feature quality among images was not taken into consideration. For the mosaic data from the AISA Eagle hyperspectral sensor, YK Han [30] used the SIFT matching result to select the optimal band for feature matching.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the perspective projection model, the camera motion can be restored from the image matching results, and the 3D positions of the matched points can also be estimated if necessary. In some studies, the affine transformation is used to simplify the estimation process [29]. In the method, affine transformation, the eight-parameter projective model, and the thin-plate spline model were applied to characterize the locations and poses of the images.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%