2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/aciiw.2017.8272607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic recognition of pain, anxiety, engagement and tiredness for virtual rehabilitation from stroke: A marginalization approach

Abstract: Virtual rehabilitation taps affective computing to personalize therapy. States of anxiety, pain and engagement (affective) and tiredness (physical or psychological) were studied to be inferable from metrics of 3D hand location-proxy of hand movement-and fingers' pressure relevant for upper limb motor recovery. Features from the data streams characterized the motor dynamics of 2 stroke patients attending 10 sessions of motor virtual rehabilitation. Experts tagged states manifestations from videos. We aid classi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, body movement is also represented by selected parameters of the human skeleton obtained with motion capturing [63]- [65]. In a rehabilitation context, Rivas et al [94] extracted mean position, speed, and acceleration from hand movement and finger pressure time series.…”
Section: Physiological Time-series Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this context, body movement is also represented by selected parameters of the human skeleton obtained with motion capturing [63]- [65]. In a rehabilitation context, Rivas et al [94] extracted mean position, speed, and acceleration from hand movement and finger pressure time series.…”
Section: Physiological Time-series Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Brahnam et al [66] trained their network with a genetic algorithm instead of backpropagation. In addition to this, researchers have used a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) [71], [85], a variant of naive Bayes classifier [94], and Genetic Selection of a Fuzzy Model (GSFM) [70].…”
Section: Recognition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations