2002
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2002.1046154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic recognition of handwritten numerical strings: a recognition and verification strategy

Abstract: A modular system to recognize handwritten numerical strings is proposed. It uses a segmentation-based recognition approach and a Recognition and Verification strategy. The approach combines the outputs from different levels such as segmentation, recognition, and postprocessing in a probabilistic model. A new verification scheme which contains two verifiers to deal with the problems of oversegmentation and undersegmentation is presented. A new feature set is also introduced to feed the oversegmentation verifier… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this initial stage of ongoing research, by our oblivious method of compression-based clustering to supply a kernel for an SVM classifier, we achieved a handwritten single decimal digit recognition accuracy of 85%. The current state-of-the-art for this problem, after half a century of interactive feature-driven classification research, in the upper ninety % level [32,14]. All experiments are bench marked on the standard NIST Special Data Base 19 (optical character recognition database).…”
Section: Optical Character Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this initial stage of ongoing research, by our oblivious method of compression-based clustering to supply a kernel for an SVM classifier, we achieved a handwritten single decimal digit recognition accuracy of 85%. The current state-of-the-art for this problem, after half a century of interactive feature-driven classification research, in the upper ninety % level [32,14]. All experiments are bench marked on the standard NIST Special Data Base 19 (optical character recognition database).…”
Section: Optical Character Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the generalization performance of C * j is measured using a test dataset (G). We employ the representation proposed by Oliveira et al [8], which is composed of 132 features. Table 3 lists important information about the database and the partitions used to compose the four separate sets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Document Text retrieval without using optical character recognition also can be performed [21] along with the minimization in the error rate [22]. Some shapes can be used [23] and verification of recognized result can be performed for enhancing the accuracy [24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%