2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07482-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic quantification of myocardium and pericardial fat from coronary computed tomography angiography: a multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After taking all of this into account, we conclude that the current state-of-the-art fully automatic EAT segmentation methods are not yet robust enough for use in studies or clinical settings, and are not better than manual segmentation. For fully automatic PAT segmentation, He et al [54] evaluate their PAT segmentation method on 422 patients and report Dice coefficients 0.88 or greater, which is slightly lower than reported inter-observer variability.…”
Section: Fully-vs Semi-automatic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After taking all of this into account, we conclude that the current state-of-the-art fully automatic EAT segmentation methods are not yet robust enough for use in studies or clinical settings, and are not better than manual segmentation. For fully automatic PAT segmentation, He et al [54] evaluate their PAT segmentation method on 422 patients and report Dice coefficients 0.88 or greater, which is slightly lower than reported inter-observer variability.…”
Section: Fully-vs Semi-automatic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Deep learning methods for segmenting PAT are similar to ones used for direct EAT segmentation. For instance, He et al [54] use a 3D-based deep attention U-Net model as in He et al [37], trained on CT images with labeled PAT and myocardium regions. The authors train and evaluate their model on 422 cardiac CT scans from six different centers, to our knowledge the largest cohort used to evaluate EAT and PAT segmentation methods.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies have done this using numerous algorithmic approaches ( Table 5 ), achieving accuracies up to 98.5%, 36 with excellent correlation with expert readers (Pearson’s correlation, r > 0.924), 37–40 , 42 and almost identical intra-study dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). 36 , 39 , 43 , 44 A similar technique has been used in combination with a fat radiomic profile (FRP) derived from biopsy and CCTA data of perivascular adipose tissue in a retrospective study by Oikonomou et al . 41 to predict MACE at a 5-year follow-up superior to traditional risk stratification tools with an AUC of 0.880 with FRP and an AUC of 0.754 without FRP.…”
Section: Applications Of Machine Learning In Cardiac Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En diferentes estudios como los realizados por (Amer, Nassar, Bendahan, Greenspan, & Ben-Eliezer, 2019), (Masoudi et al, 2020), (Dabiri et al, 2020), (He et al, 2021) y (MacLean et al, 2021 utilizaron redes neuronales convoluciones basadas en la arquitectura U-net para la segmentación de grasa en las piernas, abdomen y corazón en CT y MR, obteniendo un rendimiento superior o cercano a 0.9 en cuanto al índice DICE y Jaccard.…”
Section: Estudios Relacionadosunclassified