2021
DOI: 10.1177/14759217211061518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic quality detection system for structural objects using dynamic output method: Case study Vilnius bridges

Abstract: Paper provides an attempt to create a methodology for automated structure health monitoring procedures using vibration spectrum analysis. There is an option to use autoregressive (AR) spectral analysis to extract information from frequency spectra when conventional Fast Fourier transformation (FFT) analysis cannot give relevant information. An autoregressive spectrum analysis is widely used in optics and medicine; however, it can be applied for different purposes, such as spectra analysis in electronics or mec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method achieves fault diagnosis by collecting bearing vibration signals and performing their feature extraction, analysis and identification. The classical methods include root mean square [5], crest factor [6], fast Fourier transform [7], wavelet transform and wavelet packet transform [8], etc. The main advantages of the methods are that they can be used for noise reduction and feature extraction with no need of actual mathematical modeling [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method achieves fault diagnosis by collecting bearing vibration signals and performing their feature extraction, analysis and identification. The classical methods include root mean square [5], crest factor [6], fast Fourier transform [7], wavelet transform and wavelet packet transform [8], etc. The main advantages of the methods are that they can be used for noise reduction and feature extraction with no need of actual mathematical modeling [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%